LGTM3

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 8:36 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foo...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:12 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> LGTM1
>>
>> On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 4:04:49 PM UTC+1 Tommy Steimel wrote:
>>
>>> Okay the security reviewer has now re-reviewed it given the updated
>>> information. Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:55 PM Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:49 PM 'Tommy Steimel' via blink-dev <
>>>> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:43 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 8:47:34 PM UTC+1 Tommy Steimel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Contact emailsstei...@chromium.org, liber...@chromium.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ExplainerNone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specificationhttps://github.com/WICG/document-picture-in-picture/
>>>>>> pull/104
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This adds a user gesture requirement for the resizeBy() and
>>>>>> resizeTo() Window APIs for document picture-in-picture windows. This 
>>>>>> allows
>>>>>> websites to make use of those APIs while mitigating much of the abuse
>>>>>> potential of those APIs on an always-on-top window.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blink componentBlink>Media>PictureInPicture
>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EMedia%3EPictureInPicture>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG reviewN/A as this is a minor change to the behavior of an
>>>>>> existing API
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG review statusNot applicable
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Risks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>>
>>>>>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This added requirement would mean that calls to these API can now
>>>>>> fail. Is that new? Or are developers already expected to handle failures?
>>>>>> Do we expect developers to start checking the UserActivation API
>>>>>> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/UserActivation> before
>>>>>> calling these methods?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently these APIs always fail on document picture-in-picture
>>>>> windows regardless of user activation (to prevent really spammy
>>>>> always-on-top windows). We don't expect developers to check the
>>>>> UserActivation API at all, just to only call resizeTo()/resizeBy() in
>>>>> response to a user gesture.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From the subject and summary I also originally assumed this intent was
>>>> about adding a user gesture restriction, and it looks like your security
>>>> approval was also based on that incorrect understanding. Can you please
>>>> re-request a security review with the clarification of the scope of this
>>>> feature? Please also update the summary of the feature in ChromeStatus, eg:
>>>> "This enables the resizeBy() and resizeTo() Windows methods on document
>>>> picture-in-picture windows, but with the added restriction of a user
>>>> gesture requirement to mitigate the abuse potential".
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise it looks fine to me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: No signal (https://github.com/mozilla/
>>>>>> standards-positions/issues/670#issuecomment-1786354361) Added
>>>>>> comment to existing standards position issue for document
>>>>>> picture-in-picture. No response yet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/
>>>>>> standards-positions/issues/41#issuecomment-1786354016) Added comment
>>>>>> to existing standards position issue for document picture-in-picture. No
>>>>>> response yet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Web developers*: Positive The ability to programmatically resize
>>>>>> the document picture-in-picture window is one of the most-requested
>>>>>> features for document picture-in-picture
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ergonomics
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N/A
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Activation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N/A
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Security
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While being able to resize an always-on-top window at will is a
>>>>>> security/annoyance risk, by making the API consume a user gesture, the
>>>>>> website can only resize once per click, which limits the possible abuse
>>>>>> vectors
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N/A
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N/A
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?No
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The document picture-in-picture API is not supported on Android
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>> ?Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> document-picture-in-picture/resize-requires-user-gesture.https.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Flag name on chrome://flagsNone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finch feature nameNone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Non-finch justification
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Small, low-risk change to existing API
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tracking bughttps://crbug.com/1354325
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sample links
>>>>>> https://steimelchrome.github.io/document-pip/click_to_resize.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Estimated milestonesShipping on desktop121
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat
>>>>>> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github
>>>>>> issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>> N/A
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Statushttps://chromestatus.com/
>>>>>> feature/5398995019235328
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAE-AwAqS29Q2%2BbV89rc8x%2B3BCVQVuLw5QEPnkbrJpy-2mq2bZA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAE-AwAqS29Q2%2BbV89rc8x%2B3BCVQVuLw5QEPnkbrJpy-2mq2bZA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/740e5180-d4d9-4156-9489-21185b9bc1e6n%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/740e5180-d4d9-4156-9489-21185b9bc1e6n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYdioCrFHatD-3FV0yuzGmUxDmAoQuupJxF79kDG3nxdUA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYdioCrFHatD-3FV0yuzGmUxDmAoQuupJxF79kDG3nxdUA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw_5P0Vx7s3LM0jSwq4XxjHAqwQfrt%3D%2B1qGoB9R741mgow%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to