With my HTML editor hat on, I can confirm the spec PR looks good and only
has editorial issues left. It fell between the cracks for 2 weeks;
apologies for that.

With my API Owner hat on, LGTM1. There are a few borderline aspects here:

   - Security review on ChromeStatus has not yet been completed. However, I
   trust you will not ship this until that is resolved.
   - Technically this does not yet meet the criteria for being exempt from
   TAG review
   <https://www.chromium.org/blink/guidelines/api-owners/process-exceptions/>,
   since Safari has only shipped to beta and the specification isn't yet
   merged. However, as mentioned above the spec PR is in good shape, and I
   think it's unlikely to be worth the TAG's time to perform a review at this
   stage, for a small change of this sort.


On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 8:13 AM Di Zhang <dizha...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Based on the release note, the Webkit implementation is already
> implemented and currently shipping. Everything vertical writing-mode
> related is shipping, including the changes included in this feature.
>
> https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-17_4-release-notes
>
> For Gecko, there has been no update. The bug has been open for a year.
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1801791
>
> This feature is adding a few new WPT tests (listed in the HTML spec PR
> description [1], specifically [2]).
>
> > How far is this from being merged?
> The comments are addressed and I am pinging the HTML reviewers to take a
> final look.
>
> [1] https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10096
> [2]
> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/commit/7f56feea538b986d5681532c0dcba8c9773cd6c4
> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5241236>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 5:17:47 AM UTC-8 Manuel Rego wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 23/02/2024 21:42, Di Zhang wrote:
>> > Specification
>> >
>> > https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/8413
>> > <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/8413>
>>
>> What's the status of this issue? Is there any spec text that needs to
>> change?
>>
>> > Interoperability and Compatibility
>> >
>> > Chrome: implemented behind flag Safari: implemented behind flag
>> Firefox:
>> > implemented for <input type=range> in stable, issue created for
>> > meter/progress.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > /Gecko/: No signal
>>
>> It seems something is implemented already and you mention there's a bug
>> for some other things, could you link that bug? Are they currently
>> working on it?
>>
>> > /WebKit/: In development
>> > (
>> https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-17_4-release-notes
>> <
>> https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-17_4-release-notes>)
>> Added support for vertical writing mode support for form controls.
>> (12072686)
>>
>> Has this actually shipped in WebKit or is "in development"?
>>
>> You first mentioned "Safari: implemented behind flag", but you're
>> linking to some release notes.
>>
>> Which parts are shipped in Safari and which are not yet?
>>
>> > Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> > <
>> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?
>>
>> >
>> > Yes
>> >
>> >
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-writing-modes/forms?label=master&label=experimental&product=chrome&product=firefox&product=safari&aligned&view=interop&q=label%3Ainterop-2022-forms%20or%20label%3Ainterop-2023-forms
>> <
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-writing-modes/forms?label=master&label=experimental&product=chrome&product=firefox&product=safari&aligned&view=interop&q=label%3Ainterop-2022-forms%20or%20label%3Ainterop-2023-forms>
>>
>>
>> These tests are all passing in Chrome and Safari (only 3 failing in
>> Firefox). Is this feature adding new tests?
>>
>> > Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>> > interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github
>> > issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution
>> > may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or
>> > structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>> >
>> > HTML spec currently under review:
>> > https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10096
>> > <https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10096>
>>
>> Ok, answering my own question on the Spec link, there's indeed a PR
>> here. How far is this from being merged?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rego
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fb0208e3-06e4-4d8f-8095-7b2d9e7d32f6n%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fb0208e3-06e4-4d8f-8095-7b2d9e7d32f6n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra8LmY8A7Z%2BKHhTxnqeaJS6mVChpRoU28qM8%3DOLxzJb80w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to