LGTM3

On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 8:51:54 AM UTC-7 Daniel Bratell wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> /Daniel
> On 2024-04-08 17:35, Mike Taylor wrote:
>
> LGTM1
> On 4/4/24 2:29 PM, 'Thomas Guilbert' via blink-dev wrote:
>
> The last launch gate approval came in today. 
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:49 AM Thomas Guilbert <tguilb...@google.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> I agree that this would have been a viable solution, and this was 
>> considered and discussed with the spec editors too [1]. These Opus flags 
>> were originally supposed to be contentHint, but ultimately it would have 
>> only ever been useful for Opus, so it was decided to keep it in the Opus 
>> config.
>>
>> [1] : https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/pull/759#issuecomment-1928349508
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:10 AM Daniel Bratell <bratel...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This may be a bit of a tangent, but we had a discussion about AV1-only 
>>> encoder configuration a while back[1][2]. In the end they elected to have a 
>>> top level dictionary where some encoding configuration ended up. I wonder 
>>> if there is anything to learn from that process and their choices or if you 
>>> consider that orthogonal to this.
>>>
>>> /Daniel
>>>
>>> [1] AV1: 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADxkKiLH6ViLccGxHZzbCG_ChtSxiG59XoeYMPRqeW1Wk410rg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>> [2] ContentHint: 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY9K9_YmJRFn%3DQBKb0GsETsSFex0DPprMRRpWUWgcvAtbA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2024-03-28 08:43, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:41 PM Thomas Guilbert <tguilb...@chromium.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've flipped all the reviews and will update this thread when they are 
>>>> all completed. 
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 8:25 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
>>>> yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey! Can you flip on the various reviews (privacy, enterprise, etc) in 
>>>>> the chromestatus entry?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at 11:29:53 PM UTC+1 Thomas Guilbert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Contact emails tguilb...@chromium.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Explainer None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specification 
>>>>>> https://w3c.github.io/webcodecs/opus_codec_registration.html#dom-opusencoderconfig-signal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> `OpusEncoderConfig.signal` and `OpusEncoderConfig.application` were 
>>>>>> recently added to the WebCodecs spec [1]. Both parameters are mapped 
>>>>>> directly to implementation specific encoder knobs. These allow web 
>>>>>> authors 
>>>>>> to provide hints as to what type of data is being encoded, and in which 
>>>>>> context the data is being used. `signal` can be one of {"auto", "music", 
>>>>>> "voice"}. It configures the encoder for the best performance in encoding 
>>>>>> the specified type of data. `application` can be one of {"voip", 
>>>>>> "audio", 
>>>>>> "lowdelay"}. It configures the encoder to favor speech intelligibility, 
>>>>>> faithful reproduction of the original input, or minimal latency. [1] : 
>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/pull/777
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blink component Blink>Media>WebCodecs 
>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EMedia%3EWebCodecs>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG review None 
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Why not?
>>>  
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Risks 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Gecko*: Positive (https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/pull/777) Spec 
>>>>>> change approved by Mozilla representative. For an almost identical 
>>>>>> feature, 
>>>>>> Mozilla said the "request for standards position" was not warranted, as 
>>>>>> they were active spec participants: 
>>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/837#issuecomment-1614666364
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal. Review from WebKit was requested on the spec 
>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Can you ask for official positions? https://bit.ly/blink-signals
>>>  
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WebView application risks 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Debuggability 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>> ? Yes 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Existing WPTs will be modified to cover this feature: 
>>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webcodecs/audio-encoder-config.https.any.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Flag name on chrome://flags None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finch feature name None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Non-finch justification 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Simple parameter changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>>>> Shipping on desktop 125 
>>>>>> Shipping on Android 125 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat 
>>>>>> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github 
>>>>>> issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution 
>>>>>> may 
>>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>>> of 
>>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5165257615212544
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/> and edited by hand afterwards.
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKLbhC60_zVAt46RVhhSGxMfRcnSkdqfcevytScrXuTmg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKLbhC60_zVAt46RVhhSGxMfRcnSkdqfcevytScrXuTmg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABrVPoZamSAMNegqkOKVa8J2w4pBd-1T9eMNaUze_jtQ8p5LOA%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABrVPoZamSAMNegqkOKVa8J2w4pBd-1T9eMNaUze_jtQ8p5LOA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/df233bb9-7986-40e1-a20c-5bb75bd80c57n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to