Permissions API query support is now reflected in the explainer [1] and the
prototype [2] will be enabled by default in M128 [3].
Thanks for all the reviews and input, please do share any additional
feedback.

[1]
https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/html-fullscreen-without-a-gesture#permissions-api-integration
[2] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5583182
[3] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5665723


On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 2:43 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foo...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I think the use cases here are clear and skipping the user activation
> requirement is the only way to meet them. I believe that the biggest risk
> here is content written assuming this setting not working without it, and
> it being hard to understand why. In other words, debuggability and feature
> detection. Thank you for committing to the Permissions API query
> integration, that and good error messages addresses this risk.
>
> Thanks for also working on the spec for this. If this was a change to
> default behavior I'd want to await more input, but it's not, and the fact
> that this feature is only available to specific apps and origins massively
> reduces the risk that content on the web broadly comes to depend on this
> and breaks in other browsers.
>
> LGTM3
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:23 PM Vladimir Levin <vmp...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> LGTM2
>>
>> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:16 AM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> LGTM1, with the commitment to follow up on Permissions API integration
>>> (thanks!).
>>> On 5/15/24 6:34 PM, Reilly Grant wrote:
>>>
>>> LGTM as an IWA OWNER (3x LGTM from Blink API OWNERS are still required
>>> according to the IWA-specific API launch process
>>> <https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/isolated-web-apps/>).
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for working with the IWA and Security reviewers to figure out
>>> the right restrictions to prevent this from exacerbating fullscreen-based
>>> phishing attacks. We have the option to loosen these restrictions if a
>>> better UX solution to the notice and consent is developed.
>>> Reilly Grant | Software Engineer | reil...@chromium.org | Google Chrome
>>> <https://www.google.com/chrome>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 3:00 PM Mike Wasserman <m...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Our team can commit to adding Permissions API query integration, with
>>>> the requisite approvals.
>>>> That would provide feature detection, and also clarify
>>>> requestFullscreen method steps in the spec.
>>>>
>>>> I'm requesting approval to ship the feature in its current state, given
>>>> our commitment to follow up.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:01 AM Mike Wasserman <m...@chromium.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, this content setting does not have Permissions API integration at
>>>>> this time.
>>>>> That seems like a great future improvement, especially if user control
>>>>> of the setting is extended to more contexts.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:37 AM Alex Russell <slightly...@chromium.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Will the status of the permission be reflected in the Permissions
>>>>>> API? I see Permissions Policy integration, but not the Permissions API
>>>>>> reflection that I'd expect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 3:54:24 PM UTC-7 Mike Wasserman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks! I pinged the PR, and hope for some feedback there soon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Feature detection via Permissions API querying seems like a great
>>>>>>> follow up here, ideally alongside broadened feature availability (i.e.
>>>>>>> extending user control beyond Isolated Web Apps).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:43 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would be nice for the PR to be reviewed and approved, even
>>>>>>>> without other stakeholder support.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Additionally - the explainer mentions a few options for feature
>>>>>>>> detection. Any progress on that front? Or is it just hypothetical?
>>>>>>>> On 5/9/24 3:04 PM, Mike Wasserman wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure. I'll note that whatwg/fullscreen's PR merging includes a
>>>>>>>> question or criteria "At least two implementers are interested (and 
>>>>>>>> none
>>>>>>>> opposed)".
>>>>>>>> I have filed standards position requests with Mozilla and WebKit,
>>>>>>>> and I will ping fullscreen spec maintainers for input.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:39 AM Vladimir Levin <vmp...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ah thanks, I missed it in the explainer. The spec changes make
>>>>>>>>> sense to me. The changes don't look like they would be controversial, 
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> it's probably worthwhile to ensure that this PR is under review and/or
>>>>>>>>> landing as a part of shipping this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>> Vlad
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 12:20 PM Mike Wasserman <m...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, there's a draft PR
>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/whatwg/fullscreen/pull/235> with the
>>>>>>>>>> Explainer's anticipated spec changes
>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/html-fullscreen-without-a-gesture#spec-changes>,
>>>>>>>>>> which are designed
>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/html-fullscreen-without-a-gesture?tab=readme-ov-file#detailed-design-discussion>
>>>>>>>>>>  alike The rules for choosing a navigable
>>>>>>>>>> <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/document-sequences.html#the-rules-for-choosing-a-navigable>
>>>>>>>>>> when a new top-level traversable
>>>>>>>>>> <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/document-sequences.html#top-level-traversable>
>>>>>>>>>> is being requested, as invoked by Window.open()
>>>>>>>>>> <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/nav-history-apis.html#dom-open-dev>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    - If currentNavigable's active window
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/document-sequences.html#nav-window>
>>>>>>>>>>    does not have transient activation
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/interaction.html#transient-activation>
>>>>>>>>>>    and the user agent has been configured to not show popups (i.e., 
>>>>>>>>>> the user
>>>>>>>>>>    agent has a "popup blocker" enabled)
>>>>>>>>>>       - The user agent may inform the user that a popup has been
>>>>>>>>>>       blocked.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 7:30:09 AM UTC-7 Vladimir Levin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:46 PM Mike Wasserman <m...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> m...@chromium.org, fugu-...@chromium.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Explainer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/html-fullscreen-without-a-gesture
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Specification
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-element-requestfullscreen
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Design docs
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/html-fullscreen-without-a-gesture
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A new "Automatic Fullscreen" content setting permits
>>>>>>>>>>>> Element.requestFullscreen() without a user gesture, and permits 
>>>>>>>>>>>> browser
>>>>>>>>>>>> dialogs to appear without exiting fullscreen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The setting is blocked by default and sites cannot prompt for
>>>>>>>>>>>> permission. New UI controls are limited to Chrome's settings pages 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] and
>>>>>>>>>>>> the site info bubble. Users can allow Isolated Web Apps [2], and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> enterprise
>>>>>>>>>>>> admins can allow additional origins with the
>>>>>>>>>>>> AutomaticFullscreenAllowedForUrls policy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Combined with Window Management permission [3] and unblocked
>>>>>>>>>>>> popups [4], this unlocks valuable fullscreen capabilities:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Open a fullscreen popup on another display, from one gesture
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show fullscreen content on multiple displays from one gesture
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show fullscreen content on a new display, when it's connected
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Swap fullscreen windows between displays with one gesture
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show fullscreen content after user gesture expiry or
>>>>>>>>>>>> consumption
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] chrome://settings/content/automaticFullScreen and site
>>>>>>>>>>>> details pages
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] User control is initially scoped to security-sensitive
>>>>>>>>>>>> apps; see https://chromestatus.com/feature/5146307550248960
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] For multi-screen window placement features; see
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5252960583942144
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] To similarly permit window.open() without a user gesture;
>>>>>>>>>>>> see chrome://settings/content/popups
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink component
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink>Fullscreen
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EFullscreen>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Search tags
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fullscreen <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:Fullscreen>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> requestFullscreen
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:requestFullscreen>, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> transient
>>>>>>>>>>>> activation
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:transient%20activation>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> user gesture
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:user%20gesture>, content
>>>>>>>>>>>> setting
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:content%20setting>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> TAG review
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> N/A. This is not proposing a new or changed web API, but a
>>>>>>>>>>>> browser-specific permission configuration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Does this change also need to update the referenced spec? In the
>>>>>>>>>>> spec, it seems like if there is no transient activation, it results 
>>>>>>>>>>> in an
>>>>>>>>>>> error. I'm trying to understand whether (and how) the spec needs to 
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> updated to reflect the capability proposed in this intent
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Risks Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Element.requestFullscreen() may now succeed instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>> rejecting without transient activation. The design doc considers 
>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>> nuanced windowing corner cases. This feature is initially only 
>>>>>>>>>>>> available to
>>>>>>>>>>>> security-sensitive apps and enterprise allow-listed origins.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gecko: No signal (
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1020)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WebKit: No signal (
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/345)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Web developers: Positive. Requested by 1st and 3rd party
>>>>>>>>>>>> partners, particularly around VDI:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/window-management/issues/7
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/window-management/issues/98
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/window-management/issues/92
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://crbug.com/315859364
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ergonomics
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The explainer discusses prospective feature detection support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Activation
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Users or admins must grant the new Automatic Fullscreen content
>>>>>>>>>>>> setting, plus the Popups & Redirects content setting and the Window
>>>>>>>>>>>> Management permission, and to take full advantage of fullscreen 
>>>>>>>>>>>> windowing
>>>>>>>>>>>> features.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Security
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This capability exacerbates preexisting fullscreen usable
>>>>>>>>>>>> security concerns, so sites cannot show a permission prompt, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> user
>>>>>>>>>>>> controls are initially scoped to IWA contexts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> None; this feature is not supported on WebView for now
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sites can debug via Element.requestFullscreen()'s promise,
>>>>>>>>>>>> which may reject with a TypeError containing a message, the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> document
>>>>>>>>>>>> `fullscreenElement` property, document `fullscreenchange` +
>>>>>>>>>>>> `fullscreenerror` events, and devtools console messages. Transient
>>>>>>>>>>>> activation state is exposed via navigator.userActivation.isActive. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Script
>>>>>>>>>>>> can check the window.location.href's scheme for `isolated-app:` to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> assess
>>>>>>>>>>>> initial availability of user control for the current context.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms
>>>>>>>>>>>> (Windows, Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No; Initial support targets desktop platforms.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No; WPT coverage is not yet available, and necessitates test
>>>>>>>>>>>> driver controls for this new content setting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> DevTrial instructions
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/html-fullscreen-without-a-gesture/blob/main/HOWTO.md
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Flag name on chrome://flags
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> chrome://flags/#automatic-fullscreen-content-setting
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Finch feature name
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> AutomaticFullscreenContentSetting
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> True (Chrome settings pages, page info bubble, enterprise
>>>>>>>>>>>> policy integration)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1501130
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Launch bug
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4296344
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Measurement
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink.UseCounter.Features: FullscreenAllowedByContentSetting
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4835
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Availability expectation
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Feature is available only in Chromium browsers for the
>>>>>>>>>>>> foreseeable future
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Adoption expectation
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Feature is used by specific partner(s) to provide functionality
>>>>>>>>>>>> within 12 months of launch in Chrome
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sample links
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/michaelwasserman/iwa-windowing-example
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shipping on desktop 126
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> DevTrial on desktop 124
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/html-fullscreen-without-a-gesture#spec-changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6218822004768768
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I2P:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/CuIqA2v3cvs/m/C6J3clNxAAAJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAEsbcpVwU7-73Mux5N-0DwYHNC34d8W5z4Yrfy6Qa_if%3DDxCsQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAEsbcpVwU7-73Mux5N-0DwYHNC34d8W5z4Yrfy6Qa_if%3DDxCsQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/3b8910e6-5c31-4a00-8638-3d6a2a1632d9n%40chromium.org
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/3b8910e6-5c31-4a00-8638-3d6a2a1632d9n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAEsbcpXQRXW_Z2LzdQ%3DSTBf2aLydwrD5TT51XR3qrg4zYT8Nig%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAEsbcpXQRXW_Z2LzdQ%3DSTBf2aLydwrD5TT51XR3qrg4zYT8Nig%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "iwa-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to iwa-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/iwa-dev/CAEsbcpWxbi-Dwzhr_%3DSYjw%2BWas0qXEtk6ACLV%3DbthJ5RW8GDbw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/iwa-dev/CAEsbcpWxbi-Dwzhr_%3DSYjw%2BWas0qXEtk6ACLV%3DbthJ5RW8GDbw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/5bdf8737-200a-4d16-a621-e598f3f47740%40chromium.org
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/5bdf8737-200a-4d16-a621-e598f3f47740%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADsXd2MfuX1Gkg_DGTFmznD3wGsZZH66zccx78w2s66%3DYcj-Ww%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADsXd2MfuX1Gkg_DGTFmznD3wGsZZH66zccx78w2s66%3DYcj-Ww%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAEsbcpXZnq1NAZJrb6WfiQ8HRmJ2F%3D6tJoghAfTQn2FCfGLxyQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to