That's extremely useful, thanks!!

Can you expand on the size of the payloads in question? I'm assuming we'd
now be seeing 5x larger payloads, but I'm not sure what's the order of
magnitude we're talking about here.

On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 10:57 PM Dan McArdle <dmcar...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Hi, Daniel!
>
> First, a little background. Sites make Private Aggregation contributions
> from within isolated contexts, where they have access to cross-site data.
> The browser sends these contributions back to the site that made them via a
> report’s encrypted payload. Although the site’s reporting endpoint cannot
> decrypt incoming payloads (that is the Aggregation Service’s job), it can
> still see the length of the encrypted payloads.
>
> We need the encrypted payload to have a fixed size to prevent sites from
> leaking cross-site data. To achieve a fixed size, we limit the number of
> contributions and pad
> <https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api#padding>
> reports with null contributions if the limit is not reached.
>
> As for the workaround that I mentioned in the first message — sending more
> contributions in a second report — only Shared Storage callers can do this.
> That’s why this I2S proposes increasing the number of contributions per
> report for Protected Audience callers alone.
>
> The increased costs come in because more contributions per report means
> larger encrypted reports, and thus more computation/storage on the
> Aggregation Service.
>
> Thanks for the questions! Hope this helps.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Wednesday, October 2, 2024 at 12:05:43 PM UTC-4 Daniel Bratell wrote:
>
>> I admit to not being the most versed in Private Aggregation, but I wonder
>> why there is a limit at all? You say it might "increase the cost of
>> operating the Aggregation Service", but that connection is not clear to me
>> when you also say that people could work around the limit already.
>>
>> /Daniel
>> On 2024-09-24 17:26, Dan McArdle wrote:
>>
>> Contact emails dmcar...@chromium.org
>>
>> Explainer
>> https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/pull/138
>>
>> Specification
>> https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/pull/150
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> Enables Protected Audience script runners to make up to 100 contributions
>> per Private Aggregation report, compared to the current limit of 20.
>> Private Aggregation limits the number of histogram contributions that can
>> be embedded in a single aggregatable report, dropping any additional
>> contributions. Shared Storage callers can work around the limit by invoking
>> another Shared Storage operation. However, Protected Audience callers have
>> no persistent storage, so they lose their excess contributions at the end
>> of their auction. Note that this change is privacy neutral as the API's
>> contributions are still limited by the same privacy budget. Due to padding,
>> each Protected Audience report will have a larger payload, even if it did
>> not need the larger contribution limit. We expect that these larger reports
>> will increase the cost of operating the Aggregation Service. Please reach
>> out with any feedback.
>>
>>
>> Blink component Blink>PrivateAggregation
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EPrivateAggregation>
>>
>> TAG review https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/846 (We have
>> not requested a signal for these changes specifically.)
>>
>> TAG review status Declined
>>
>> Risks
>>
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> *Gecko*: No signal (
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/805) We have not
>> requested a signal for this change specifically. The Gecko position on
>> Shared Storage (one of the ways Private Aggregation is exposed) is negative.
>>
>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/189) We have not
>> requested a signal for this change specifically.
>>
>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>> https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/issues/81
>> )
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>
>> WebView application risks
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> Debuggability
>>
>> No new debug capabilities beyond the existing internals page (
>> chrome://private-aggregation-internals) and temporary debug mode. These
>> capabilities will reflect the merged contributions.
>>
>>
>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>
>> All but WebView
>>
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ? Yes
>>
>> Flag name on chrome://flags None
>>
>> Finch feature name
>> PrivateAggregationApi100ContributionsForProtectedAudience
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>
>> Tracking bug https://crbug.com/360160864
>>
>> Launch bug https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4336057
>>
>> Estimated milestones
>> Shipping on desktop 131
>> Shipping on Android 131
>>
>> Anticipated spec changes
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>> None
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5114676393017344?gate=5096059924381696
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGmnN45m%3DJJ3ja7_zA71nOn%3DjiBw%2Br0uFQuR0hwqHxtXzuZf4g%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGmnN45m%3DJJ3ja7_zA71nOn%3DjiBw%2Br0uFQuR0hwqHxtXzuZf4g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1ded3947-aff7-4fd5-9b42-d11f72bc7997n%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1ded3947-aff7-4fd5-9b42-d11f72bc7997n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKmYGDPpqNcqBERjJqCJVzG6kYNLW%2BpQ9yZtt3QYYVEaw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to