Thanks Evan for the follow-up.
The response to the TAG feedback mentions a few changes that would be 
web-facing:

- Removing "cloud-only"
-  Changing installOnDevice to support multiple langs in a single call, 
including the consideration of a more expressive return value type.
- Adding an AbortSignal parameter to the download/install function

For the first one I see that you 
have https://github.com/WebAudio/web-speech-api/pull/150.
For the other two, are those changes you plan to make prior to shipping? 
The second one in particular seems like it'd be breaking if done afterwards.

-- Dan
On Friday, April 18, 2025 at 11:31:50 AM UTC-7 ev...@google.com wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We discussed the TAG feedback at the Audio Working Group meeting yesterday 
> and I've posted our response here: 
> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1038#issuecomment-2815982645
>
> Please let me know if anyone has any questions/comments/concerns.
>
> I don't think there's any particular reason to unprefix before shipping 
>> on-device, is there?
>
> Also to answer your question, Rick, I don't think there's any reason to 
> unprefix before shipping on-device, so we might as well lump it together as 
> a bundle :).
>
> Thanks!
> Evan
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:54 AM Brian Kardell <bkar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Just linking this up as I see there are some questions, but the opening 
>> post seems to suggest there are positive signals from WebKit... 
>>
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/443
>>
>> On Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 10:55:52 AM UTC-4 Rick Byers wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 8:14 PM Evan Liu <ev...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the detailed feedback, Jeffrey! We'll discuss this at the 
>>>> Audio Working Group meeting this week and I'll update this thread 
>>>> afterwards.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Evan
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 9:08 PM Jeffrey Yasskin <jyas...@chromium.org> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FYI, the TAG left comments at 
>>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1038#issuecomment-2803693504
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 10:22 AM Evan Liu <ev...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Are you thinking it might be reasonable to ship in M128 (decide by 
>>>>>>> branch on Apr 28, plan to merge any required changes before May 21)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That sounds like a reasonable target, assuming TAG doesn't propose 
>>>>>> any significant changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, if you want to, I'm supportive of shipping the unprefixing 
>>>>>>> alone 
>>>>>>> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6422562> 
>>>>>>> now, 
>>>>>>> since you already proved to us that the unprefixed API is not an 
>>>>>>> opportunity to make any breaking API changes. Do you prefer to decouple 
>>>>>>> that, or just wait and get the whole bundle approved to ship together?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Either is fine with me! Would decoupling just be a matter of making 
>>>>>> the changes, or would I need to create a separate Chrome Status entry, 
>>>>>> get 
>>>>>> position statements, all of the approvals, etc.? If it's the former, we 
>>>>>> might as well make the change now. Otherwise it might just be easier to 
>>>>>> bundle everything together. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> I'm OK with just shipping the unprefixing under this same intent without 
>>> the extra paperwork, but also it's a bit simpler if we just keep it all 
>>> lumped together as a bundle. I don't think there's any particular reason to 
>>> unprefix before shipping on-device, is there?
>>>  
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Evan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 6:51 AM Thomas Steiner <to...@google.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This all looks great to me! Are you thinking it might be reasonable 
>>>>>>>> to ship in M128 (decide by branch on Apr 28, plan to merge any 
>>>>>>>> required 
>>>>>>>> changes before May 21)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Off by one, classic. I think you meant 1*3*8 here. I know it's 
>>>>>>> obvious now, but someone might once look back at this in ten years from 
>>>>>>> now 
>>>>>>> and wonder…
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> Whoops, yes of course - thank you :-).
>>>  
>>>
>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/3deb7274-8a70-4b28-a60a-02d76d22ba14n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to