LGTM3

On Thursday, April 17, 2025 at 1:47:50 AM UTC+9 dma...@microsoft.com wrote:

> *Contact emails*
>
> dman...@microsoft.com
>
> *Explainer*
>
>
> https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/SVG/allow-use-to-reference-entire-files.md
>
> *Specification*
>
> https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/struct.html#UseElement
>
> *Summary*
>
> In this feature, we are streamlining the SVG <use> element by loosening 
> referencing requirements. 
>
> Currently, authors need to explicitly reference fragments within the SVG 
> document. If no fragment id is given <use> will not be able to resolve the 
> target and nothing will be rendered/referred. 
>
> For example: a <use> element referencing an external file with fragment 
> identifier will look like: 
>
> <svg>
>    <use xlink:href="myshape.svg#icon"></use>
> </svg> 
>
> In this example, #icon is the fragment identifier pointing to an element 
> with id="icon" within myshape.svg. 
>
> and without fragment identifier it will look like:
>
> <svg>
>
>      <use xlink:href="myshape.svg"></use>
>
> </svg> 
>
> With this feature, omitting fragments or just giving the external svg file 
> name will automatically reference the root element, eliminating the need 
> for authors to alter the referenced document just to assign an ID to the 
> root. This enhancement simplifies this manual editing process and improves 
> efficiency.
>
>  
>
> *Blink component*
>
> Blink>SVG 
> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ESVG%22>
>
> *TAG review*
>
> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1081
>
> *TAG review status*
>
> Issues open
>
> *Risks*
>
>  
>
> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>
> None
>
>
>
> *Gecko*: No signal (
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1204)
>
> *WebKit*: Neutral (
> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/480)
>
> *Web developers*: 
> Positive Customer/Developer Feedback: 
>
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68746095/why-cant-i-import-an-svg-by-using-use-without-using-the-id
>  
> “Whenever I import an SVG with <use> element it won't work unless I 
> specify the id of that SVG even though it's the only SVG in the document!” 
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/47595422/8583692 
> “SVG external reference without id” 
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/50896563/8583692 
> “Why do SVG fragment identifiers without hash not work?” 
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/55452106/8583692 
> “How to use the whole SVG with a <use> tag?”
>
>  https://stackoverflow.com/q/53794292/8583692 
> “Display external SVG with <use> tag and href or xlink:href attribute?” 
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/68746095/8583692 
> ”Why can't I import an SVG by using <use> without using the id?”
>
> *Other signals*: 15 individuals had voted that this bug impacts them in 
> the original CRBug https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40362369
>
> *WebView application risks*
>
> *Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?*
>
> None
>
>  
>
> *Debuggability*
>
> No new DevTools support was required as existing mechanisms for debugging 
> <use> today will apply to this new functionality.
>
>  
>
> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>
> Yes
>
> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>
> Yes
> Chromium Repo WPTs: 
> https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/web_tests/external/wpt/svg/struct/reftests/use-external-svg-resource-no-fragment-id.html?q=%2Fuse-external-svg-resource-no-fragment-id.html
>
> *Flag name on about://flags*
>
>  
>
> *Finch feature name*
>
> AllowSvgUseToReferenceExternalDocumentRoot
>
> *Rollout plan*
>
> Will ship enabled for all users
>
> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>
> False
>
> *Tracking bug*
>
> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40362369
>
> *Estimated milestones*
>
> Shipping on desktop
>
> 137
>
> Shipping on Android
>
> 137
>
> Shipping on WebView
>
> 137
>
> Shipping on iOS
>
> 137
>
>  
>
> *Anticipated spec changes*
>
> *Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).*
>
> None
>
> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5128141573718016?gate=5095930770227200
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>
>  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ff561ff4-c836-46fb-bb2e-b467b9dddd63n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to