*Summary*

The renderBlockingStatus flag in Resource Timing
<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/PerformanceResourceTiming/renderBlockingStatus>
allows
identification of resources which are render-blocking and so may benefit
for performance tuning.

Currently, this is set to the initial status when the fetch is initiated,
which causes developer confusion
<http://issues.chromium.org/issues/457303652> when a subsequent use of that
fetch makes a fetch render-blocking.

For example this would be result in a render-blocking request being
reported:

<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/styles.css">


but this would not:

<link rel="preload" as="style" href="css/styles.css"><link
rel="stylesheet" href="css/styles.css">

as preloads are not render-blocking.

This use of preloads is a common pattern (though it's debatable whether
it's an anti-pattern!) and the resource is render-blocking so it's odd to
report it as not.

*Milestones*

We plan to change this
<https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7112285> in M144
to allow the latest status to be used at the time the fetch is completed to
match developer's expectations.

*Web Compatibility*

Chromium is currently the only engine shipping this flag in Resource Timing.

Impact is expected to be minimal. This only changes reporting in Resource
Timing and will just result in more accurate reporting of render-blocking
status. As such we are not planning to feature flag this change.

*Specification*

Issue have been raised in these places to awareness and to add any
necessary spec changes:

   - *Resource Timing:* https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1875
   - *Fetch*: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1875

Thanks,
Barry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAH6JyLRUiay4QTq7KkQ8Bb7-cPpzG14SiV4vTdx77J4DZL%3Dqpg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to