Thanks very much for the suggestions! We will look into this issue and 
follow up the WG discussions if there is any.

On Wednesday, 5 November 2025 at 16:58:55 UTC Philip Jägenstedt wrote:

> What I would suggest is to test the current behavior and make any changes 
> you think are necessary for a good user experience, to report that on the 
> issue and then ship.
>
> FWIW, I tested <textarea style="caret-shape:block"> with a simplified 
> Chinese IME on macOS, and I failed to make it misbehave in some obvious 
> way. When stepping back to put the caret within the currently uncommitted 
> text can insert a space in the string that is the size of a block caret, 
> but it does that regardless of the caret shape it seems.
>
> P.S. I also tested caret-shape:🥕 but no hidden easter egg...
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 5:38 PM Stephen Chenney <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Am I correct in understanding that we can ship and follow up with the IME 
>> issue?
>>
>> Regardless we will capture the IME behavior and update the CSS WG issue. 
>> With some luck we can get it discussed soon.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 11:33 AM Philip Jägenstedt <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> LGTM2
>>>
>>> Stephen, Ziran, how does this interact with IME in Chromium? Can you 
>>> document the behavior in 
>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13055 and follow up to align 
>>> with the WG resolution when there is one? Updating this thread when that 
>>> happens would be much appreciated.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 5:27 PM Alex Russell <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> LGTM1, contingent on a resolution to the a11y concern Mike has flagged.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, November 4, 2025 at 7:42:58 AM UTC-8 Mike Taylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/29/25 7:34 a.m., Chromestatus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Explainer*
>>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#caret-shape
>>>>>
>>>>> *Specification*
>>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#caret-shape 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Summary*
>>>>> The shape of the caret in native applications is most commonly a 
>>>>> vertical bar, an underscore or a rectangular block. In addition, the 
>>>>> shape 
>>>>> often varies depending on the input mode, such as insert or replace. The 
>>>>> CSS caret-shape property allows sites to choose one of these shapes for 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> caret inside editable elements, or leave the choice up to the browser. 
>>>>> The 
>>>>> recognized property values are auto, bar, block and underscore. 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Blink component*
>>>>> Blink>CSS 
>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ECSS%22>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>>> caret-shape <https://webstatus.dev/features/caret-shape> 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Motivation*
>>>>> To allow authors to specify the desired shape of the text insertion 
>>>>> caret. 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#caret-shape
>>>>>
>>>>> *Search tags*
>>>>> caret-shape <http:///features#tags:caret-shape>
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review*
>>>>> *No information provided* 
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>>> Pending 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Risks*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>>> *No information provided* 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1211) dholbert 
>>>>> commented - "Seems reasonable; I'd suggest a "positive" 
>>>>> standards-position. 
>>>>> There are a handful of use-cases that use a caret-shape: block sort of 
>>>>> rendering that I can find - e.g. gnome-terminal (which lets you choose 
>>>>> between Block, I-Beam, and Underline) and the graphical version of emacs. 
>>>>> And it seems useful for the web platform to offer the same sort of 
>>>>> cosmetic 
>>>>> flexibility in matching that caret-style, for web developers who are 
>>>>> designing a web-based application inspired by these sorts of native 
>>>>> applications. (Masayuki mentions a case in 
>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1715487#c0 where this 
>>>>> sort of feature might make things easier for Korean IME users, too; so 
>>>>> there's potentially a usability benefit for some international 
>>>>> audiences.)"
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that Masayuki-san also just filed 
>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13055, describing cases 
>>>>> where this feature might make IMEs harder to use.  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/484)
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals Bloomberg have requested this. Also see 
>>>>> above comments by dholbert on possible use cases.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> *Activation*
>>>>> No risk.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Security*
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? 
>>>>> *No information provided* 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>>> Support in DevTools. 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>>> Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>>> Yes 
>>>>> Tests are located at 
>>>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-ui/, 
>>>>> including Parsing test: caret-shape-parsing.html; caret-shape: block 
>>>>> tests: 
>>>>> caret-shape-block-001.html caret-shape-block-001-vrl.html 
>>>>> caret-shape-block-001-rtl.html caret-shape-block-001-rtl-vlr.html 
>>>>> caret-shape-block-001-rtl-vrl.html 
>>>>> caret-shape-block-001-rtl-sideways-rl.html 
>>>>> caret-shape-block-001-sideways-lr.html 
>>>>> caret-shape-block-001-rtl-sideways-lr.html caret-shape-block-002.html 
>>>>> caret-shape-block-empty-001.html caret-shape-block-fallback-001.html 
>>>>> caret-shape-block-zoom.html; caret-shape: underscore tests: 
>>>>> caret-shape-underscore-001.html; caret-shape overflow tests: 
>>>>> caret-eol-001.html caret-eol-002.html caret-eol-003.html 
>>>>> caret-eol-004.tentative.html. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-ui?label=experimental&label=master&aligned,
>>>>>  
>>>>> in case others want to see the results at a quick glance. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>>> Experimental web platform features 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>>> CSSCaretShape 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>>
>>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>>> False
>>>>>
>>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/353713061
>>>>>
>>>>> *Measurement*
>>>>> Through usual CSS feature counters.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>>
>>>>> No milestones specified
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github 
>>>>> issues 
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of 
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way). 
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6106160780017664?gate=4913075303743488
>>>>>
>>>>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>>>> Intent to Prototype: 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/680b870d.170a0220.15e62e.0520.GAE%40google.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6901fbb3.050a0220.56be2.0463.GAE%40google.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6901fbb3.050a0220.56be2.0463.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/88d21f34-5297-4618-9a62-231cb523740bn%40chromium.org
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/88d21f34-5297-4618-9a62-231cb523740bn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/e171a11f-1923-4fce-97fe-950f5dab52ebn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to