LGTM1

On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 7:22 PM Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Frank,
>
> Since this is TC39 we don't need a position request as long as it's at
> stage 3. Sorry, my mistake.
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 5:45 PM 'Frank Tang (譚永鋒)' via blink-dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> API owner is asking about  the position from WebKit so we need a Safari
>> TR release note or WebKit bug tracking for this I think.
>>
>> "What about webkit? Could you file a standards position request for
>> them?"
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 4:27 PM Shane Carr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The Pull Request went through the TC39 process for normative pull
>>> requests. It was approved in the May 2025 TC39-TG1 plenary.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/main/meetings/2025-05/may-28.md#normative-add-intllocaleprototypevariants-ecma402960
>>>
>>> Here are notes from when TC39-TG2 approved the Pull Request before it
>>> went to plenary.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/blob/main/meetings/notes-2025-05-08.md#normative-add-localeprototypegetvariants-960
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 2:03 PM Frank Tang (譚永鋒) <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Engineers from Apple was present in the discussion of this spec change
>>>> I will ask them tomorrow in TC39 TG2 meeting
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 6:00 AM Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> What about webkit? Could you file a standards position request for
>>>>> them?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 6:07 PM Chromestatus <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Specification*
>>>>>> https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-Intl.Locale.prototype.variants
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Summary*
>>>>>> Add Intl.Locale.prototype.variants as stated in
>>>>>> https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-Intl.Locale.prototype.variants and also
>>>>>> accept "variants" in option bag in Intl.Locale consturctor as in
>>>>>> https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-updatelanguageid The changes to ECMA402
>>>>>> is merged in https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/960 and the test
>>>>>> code in test262 are merged in in
>>>>>> https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/4474/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Blink component*
>>>>>> Blink>JavaScript>Internationalization
>>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EJavaScript%3EInternationalization%22>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>>>> intl-locale <https://webstatus.dev/features/intl-locale>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Motivation*
>>>>>> TC39 already approve for the change so it is now part of ECMA402
>>>>>> spec.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *TAG review*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>>>> Issues addressed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Risks*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1970161)
>>>>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Releases/141
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Web developers*: Strongly positive (
>>>>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/Locale/variants
>>>>>> )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>> No
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> Test262 https://github.com/tc39/test262/tree/main/test/intl402/Locale
>>>>>> 'intl402/Locale/constructor-getter-order':
>>>>>> 'intl402/Locale/constructor-options-throwing-getters':
>>>>>> 'intl402/Locale/constructor-options-variants-invalid':
>>>>>> 'intl402/Locale/constructor-options-variants-valid':
>>>>>> 'intl402/Locale/getters-grandfathered': 'intl402/Locale/getters-missing':
>>>>>> 'intl402/Locale/prototype/variants/name':
>>>>>> 'intl402/Locale/prototype/variants/prop-desc':
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Non-finch justification*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>>>> False
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Availability expectation*
>>>>>> Feature is available on Web Platform Baseline within 12 months of
>>>>>> launch in Chrome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Adoption expectation*
>>>>>> Feature is considered a best practice for some use case within 12
>>>>>> months of reaching Web Platform baseline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Non-OSS dependencies*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open
>>>>>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
>>>>>> NO
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>>> Shipping on desktop 144
>>>>>> Shipping on Android 144
>>>>>> Shipping on WebView 144
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat
>>>>>> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github
>>>>>> issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/4709921706868736?gate=5072143612248064
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>>>>> Intent to Prototype:
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/68e5bd35.050a0220.3258b8.05f2.GAE%40google.com
>>>>>> Ready for Trial:
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/i6QEHcH_fiI/m/4xUyZbSvAAAJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/69053325.710a0220.23debc.0105.GAE%40google.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/69053325.710a0220.23debc.0105.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Frank Yung-Fong Tang
>>>> 譚永鋒 / 🌭🍊
>>>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Frank Yung-Fong Tang
>> 譚永鋒 / 🌭🍊
>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2B7fzPE_7UDTXPo6NYqxNdd8FA10ceOB9b6C8y6G_fxyOYRJzw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2B7fzPE_7UDTXPo6NYqxNdd8FA10ceOB9b6C8y6G_fxyOYRJzw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw9ejxmYy7GUVTpyRDJRxSSGG5BxD%2B4Dq4tfxNKQeB%3DyaQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to