On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 4:20 AM Daniel Cheng <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> >> These members were there all along. It's just that they are more visible >> now >> instead of being hidden away by compiler-generated code; I consider that a >> good thing. We haven't created more layer violations -- if A is not >> allowed >> to hold B, it shouldn't be allowed to do so through a Supplementable-like >> system either IMO (and Supplementable had big warnings on it that it was >> prone to type confusion if used with inheritance). >> > > Though `Supplementable` and `base::SupportsUserData` have sharp edges and > could use improvement, the underlying abstraction still has value. > Perhaps this is a good opportunity to design a Supplementable V2 that polishes the rough edges? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAjAU%3DZ4%3DQbtgLWggcRvWaOgtz-2AZOa2Uvz0D0dSpn-3vJ%3D8A%40mail.gmail.com.
