LGTM1.
This looks a reasonable behavior change, and compatibility impact would be
small.


On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 11:25 PM 'Sejal Anand' via blink-dev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> *Contact emails*
> [email protected]
>
> *Specification*
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-adjust-1/#forced-colors-properties
>
> *Summary*
> This change updates Chromium’s emoji rendering behavior in Forced Colors
> Mode. During computed-value resolution, emoji whose font-variant-emoji
> value computes to normal or unicode are rendered using their monochrome
> glyphs when available.
>
> Chromium will therefore suppress color emoji rendering, which ensures
> emojis fully participate in the Forced Colors Mode pipeline and respect
> system high-contrast colors. Behavior outside forced colors mode is
> unchanged.
>
> *Blink component*
> Blink>Fonts
> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EFonts%22>
>
> *Web Feature ID*
> forced-colors <https://webstatus.dev/features/forced-colors>
>
> *Motivation*
> Forced Colors Mode (High Contrast Mode) is designed to improve readability
> for visually impaired users by applying system-defined high-contrast colors
> across all content. However, colorful emoji do not adapt to these enforced
> colors. They often retain their original multicolor appearance, which can
> make them blend into the background, appear low-contrast, or become
> visually distracting. This undermines the purpose of the mode and creates
> inconsistent accessibility behavior compared to the rest of the text
> rendering pipeline.
>
> To address this, Chromium now ensures that in Forced Colors Mode, at
> computed-value time, any emoji whose font-variant-emoji value resolves to
> normal or unicode will render using a monochrome variant when available.
> This makes emoji follow the same contrast and color constraints as
> surrounding text, improves readability, and aligns emoji rendering with
> user expectations for high-contrast environments.
>
> *Initial public proposal*
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8064
>
> *TAG review*
> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1156
>
> *TAG review status*
> Issues addressed
>
> *Risks*
>
>
> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
> This will change emoji font rendering for web pages when in Forced Colors
> Mode, but no major interoperability or compatibility issues are anticipated.
>
> *Gecko*: No signal (
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1323)
>
> *WebKit*: No signal Forced color mode is not entirely supported in Apple
> systems.
>
> *Web developers*: Positive Four users have reported being affected by
> this issue: https://issues.chromium.org/issues/420857717
>
> *Other signals*:
>
> *WebView application risks*
> *Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?*
> *No information provided*
>
>
> *Debuggability*
> Existing DevTools capabilities already cover this.
>
> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
> Yes
>
> *Is this feature fully tested by **web-platform-tests
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>*
> *?*
> Yes
>
> https://wpt.fyi/results/forced-colors-mode/forced-colors-mode-57.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned
>
>
> Https://wpt.fyi/results/forced-colors-mode/forced-colors-mode-58.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned
> <https://wpt.fyi/results/forced-colors-mode/forced-colors-mode-58.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned>
>
> Https://wpt.fyi/results/forced-colors-mode/forced-colors-mode-59.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
> <https://wpt.fyi/results/forced-colors-mode/forced-colors-mode-59.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned>
>
>
> https://wpt.fyi/results/forced-colors-mode/forced-colors-mode-60.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>
> *Flag name on about://flags*
> *No information provided*
>
> *Finch feature name*
> EmojiMonochromeRendering
>
> *Rollout plan*
> Will ship enabled for all users
>
> *Requires code in //chrome?*
> False
>
> *Tracking bug*
> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/420857717
>
> *Estimated milestones*
> Shipping on desktop
> 144
> Shipping on Android
> 144
> Shipping on WebView
> 144
> Shipping on iOS
> 144
>
>
> *Anticipated spec changes*
> *Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).*
> None
>
> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5861138256494592?gate=6515528338374656
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/SIAP153MB1127867C34B9382068C95748D4DFA%40SIAP153MB1127.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/SIAP153MB1127867C34B9382068C95748D4DFA%40SIAP153MB1127.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
TAMURA Kent
Software Engineer, Google

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGH7WqF8QhQdAw6aS9%2BbqoRuUK9HxHwTNjafO5-6aM74FJgK8Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to