More WPTs are in, for the 3 types of workers (dedicated, service, and shared).
/hubert On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 9:26 AM Hubert Chao <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 11:35 AM Hubert Chao <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 10:23 AM Mike Taylor <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 2/19/26 2:28 p.m., Chromestatus wrote: >>> >>> *Contact emails* >>> [email protected] >>> >>> *Explainer* >>> https://github.com/WICG/local-network-access/blob/main/explainer.md >>> >>> *Specification* >>> >>> https://wicg.github.io/local-network-access/#integration-with-webtransport >>> >>> I'd be happier if we spent some time defining the actual integration >>> with WebTransport - this doesn't really describe how or when LNA should be >>> applied. i.e., does it happen in the constructor steps? Or when obtaining a >>> connection? Somewhere else? Does it ever throw an error? etc >>> >> >> The short answer is that this check happens in the constructor before a >> connection is attempted. Re: more spec work, its something that is on our >> list of things to do, but we've chosen to prioritize other LNA landing work >> to ensure better user experiences (see the ongoing discussion in >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/8AK8V4fSZFU) >> >> Looking briefly at the specs, I'm not 100% sure if we'd patch the fetch >> spec for "obtaining a connection" ( >> https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-connection-obtain) which is >> referenced in webtransport's "obtaining a connection" section (here >> <https://www.w3.org/TR/webtransport/#webtransport-constructor:~:text=Let%20connection%20be%20the%20result%20of%20obtaining%20a%20connection%20with%20networkPartitionKey%2C%20url%2C%20false%2C%20newConnection%2C%20requireUnreliable%20and%20webTransportHashes.>). >> If its the former, than we wouldn't need to change the WebTransport spec at >> all. >> >> >>> >>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests >>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?* >>> No >>> >>> Why not? It seems like this should be possible >>> >> >> Because we haven't prioritized WPTs for LNA up until recently; we've been >> using chromium browser tests and unit tests. This is on our priority list >> (again see the discussion ongoing in >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/8AK8V4fSZFU) >> > > Update: we have WPT's covering WebSockets > <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/fetch/local-network-access/websocket.tentative.https.html> > and WebTransport > <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/fetch/local-network-access/webtransport.tentative.https.html> > . > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAHEiSH36Y6O-3eoPWR74ir4UzdGeRdw4%2BHVSM8yXaZ2VJgkv%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com.
