LGTM2; thanks for shipping this with high quality!

On Thursday, April 30, 2026 at 1:56:34 PM UTC-7 Chris Harrelson wrote:

> LGTM1
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 2:47 PM 'Sam Davis Omekara' via blink-dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Philip,
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing. All the failing tests are understood. Here’s a 
>> breakdown of the issues:
>>
>>    - Insets ink overflow tests (6):
>>       - grid-gap-decorations-091.html, grid-gap-decorations-092.html, 
>>       flex-gap-decorations-066.html, flex-gap-decorations-067.html, 
>>       multicol-gap-decorations-038.html, multicol-gap-decorations-039.html  
>>       - The change was made last Friday, and the wpt runner is not 
>>       running the latest Chrome Canary version hence the reason why these 
>> are 
>>       failing
>>    - Minor fragmentation issues (3):
>>       - flex-gap-decorations-fragmentation-005.html, 
>>       flex-gap-decorations-fragmentation-006.html, 
>>       multicol-gap-decorations-007.html
>>       - These issues are well-understood, and we don't consider them 
>>       feature blocking, but we have work in progress to address them.
>>    
>>
>> On Wednesday, April 29, 2026 at 2:36:19 AM UTC-7 Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> It's great to see this highly requested feature completed! The test 
>>> suite 
>>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-gaps?label=experimental&label=master&aligned>
>>>  
>>> looks quite big in terms of number of tests, and tests across layout 
>>> models, but there are 9 failing tests 
>>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-gaps?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=chrome%3A%21ok%20chrome%3A%21pass>.
>>>  
>>> Are the reasons for these failures understood? It it feasible to fix them 
>>> all?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Philip
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 9:25 PM 'Sam Davis Omekara' via blink-dev <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>> [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> *Explainer*
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/CSSGapDecorations/explainer.md
>>>>
>>>> *Specification*
>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-gaps-1
>>>>
>>>> *Summary*
>>>> CSS Gap Decorations enables styling of gaps in container layouts like 
>>>> Grid and Flexbox, similar to ‘column-rule’ in multicol layout. This 
>>>> feature 
>>>> is highly requested by web authors who must use hacks to style the gaps in 
>>>> Grid and Flexbox layouts today.
>>>>
>>>> *Blink component*
>>>> Blink>Layout 
>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ELayout%22>
>>>>
>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>> gap-decorations <https://webstatus.dev/features/gap-decorations>
>>>>
>>>> *Motivation*
>>>> Today, web authors rely on non-ergonomic workarounds such as the 
>>>> following examples to apply styles to the gaps in Grid and Flexbox 
>>>> layouts: 
>>>> https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2017/09/css-grid-gotchas-stumbling-blocks/#how-do-i-add-backgrounds-and-borders-to-grid-areas
>>>>  https://x.com/geddski/status/1004731709764534274 CSS Gap Decorations 
>>>> will allow authors to avoid such workarounds and apply styles in a 
>>>> seamless 
>>>> manner provided by the platform.
>>>>
>>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10393
>>>>
>>>> *Search tags*
>>>> grid <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:grid>, flexbox 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:flexbox>, multicol 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:multicol>, column 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:column>, row 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:row>, gap 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:gap>, decoration 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:decoration>
>>>>
>>>> *TAG review*
>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1035
>>>>
>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>> Issues addressed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Risks*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>> Gap Decorations is a highly requested feature among web developers. 
>>>> Early discussions within the CSSWG meeting did not highlight any major 
>>>> concerns from other browser vendors so far. See discussions on: 
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10393
>>>>
>>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1158)
>>>>
>>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/444)
>>>>
>>>> *Web developers*: Positive Developers are excited about the CSS Gap 
>>>> Decoration feature. See discussions around this here: 
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10393 
>>>>
>>>> This also surfaced as a most requested missing feature in State of CSS 
>>>> 2023. https://2023.stateofcss.com/en-US/usage/#css_missing_features 
>>>>
>>>> The chromium tracking issue (
>>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/357648037) has 18 upvotes from 
>>>> developers.
>>>>
>>>> Following dev trials, the feature drew substantial enthusiasm across 
>>>> web developer channels:
>>>>
>>>>     Social media:
>>>>         - 
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/day-164-new-way-style-gaps-emiliano-pisu-x0h1f
>>>>  
>>>>         - https://mastodon.social/@anatudor/114201225562770826 
>>>>         - 
>>>> https://app.daily.dev/posts/a-new-way-to-style-gaps-in-css-9lolqu2yp 
>>>>         - https://x.com/Manz/status/1968682837453799570 
>>>>         - https://x.com/shadeed9/status/1822025452476592630
>>>>          - 
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/kirangrandhi_goodbye-to-css-hackshello-to-native-gap-activity-7341108234121900034-_ObL
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>     Articles and videos:
>>>>         - 
>>>> https://www.alwaystwisted.com/articles/styling-the-gap-with-css 
>>>>         - https://youtu.be/L1-7dFQFb1c 
>>>>         - https://css-tricks.com/the-gap-strikes-back-now-stylable/ 
>>>>         - https://heydesigner.com/newsletter/product-design-2025/
>>>>
>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>
>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>> *Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?*
>>>> There are no WebView application risks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>> DevTools already provides a layout overlay for gaps in Grid and 
>>>> Flexboxes. Computed values for new properties introduced for gap 
>>>> decoration 
>>>> will be exposed.
>>>>
>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>> Yes
>>>>
>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by **web-platform-tests* 
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>> *?*
>>>> Yes
>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-gaps
>>>>
>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>> enable-experimental-web-platform-features
>>>>
>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>> CSSGapDecoration
>>>>
>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>
>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>> False
>>>>
>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/357648037
>>>>
>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>> Shipping on desktop
>>>> 149
>>>> DevTrial on desktop
>>>> 139
>>>> Shipping on Android
>>>> 149
>>>> Shipping on WebView
>>>> 149
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>> *Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>> of 
>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).*
>>>> There are no open issues affecting the current level of the spec. All 
>>>> open issues are scoped to a future level of the spec and do not introduce 
>>>> web compat or interop risk for what is shipping now.
>>>>
>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5157805733183488?gate=6254826279927808
>>>>
>>>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>>> Intent to Prototype: 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/PH8PR00MB1471DB453B0D0025F83B1F06D8BA2%40PH8PR00MB1471.namprd00.prod.outlook.com
>>>> Ready for Trial: 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/vmO3X2aYL2Y/m/f9LLE_W8AAAJ
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CH3PR00MB2681301B231C1C1B50B21206D8372%40CH3PR00MB2681.namprd00.prod.outlook.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CH3PR00MB2681301B231C1C1B50B21206D8372%40CH3PR00MB2681.namprd00.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>>
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6564d359-d092-4803-905d-4647ea3270f9n%40chromium.org
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6564d359-d092-4803-905d-4647ea3270f9n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/b495151c-7cf0-42dc-96bd-4c7cef0a4066n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to