LGTM2

On Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 11:30:32 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:

> This will be really useful! LGTM1 pending my question on the other I2S 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/gbIWh0i2vOo/m/Ck3gX1ZbBgAJ>
>  confirming 
> whether Gecko is shipping image()/none.
>
> On Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 4:04:33 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> NOTE: This feature depends on 
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5121011285622784 as it uses the 
>> `image(transparent)` when the result contains none. `light-dark(none, 
>> none)` for example.
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 2:29:56 PM UTC+8 Chromestatus wrote:
>>
> *Contact emails*
>>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>
>>
>>>
>>> *Specification*
>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-5/#light-dark 
>>>
>>> *Summary*
>>> Extends the CSS light-dark() function to accept image values (url(), 
>>> image-set(), none) in author stylesheets, allowing image properties like 
>>> background-image, list-style-image, border-image-source, cursor, and 
>>> content to automatically switch between images based on the user's 
>>> preferred color scheme. Previously this was only allowed in UA stylesheets. 
>>> This aligns with the CSS Color 5 spec and matches Firefox's existing 
>>> implementation. 
>>>
>>> *Blink component*
>>> Blink 
>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%22>
>>>
>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>> light-dark <https://webstatus.dev/features/light-dark> 
>>>
>>> *Motivation*
>>> Without this feature, web developers who want to switch images based on 
>>> the user's color scheme preference must use @media (prefers-color-scheme) 
>>> queries or maintain separate stylesheets for light and dark themes. This is 
>>> verbose and error-prone, especially when the same element uses light-dark() 
>>> for its color properties but must use a media query for its image 
>>> properties. The light-dark() function already supports color values, making 
>>> it the natural place for image values as well. Allowing url(), image-set(), 
>>> and none inside light-dark() for properties like background-image, 
>>> list-style-image, border-image-source, cursor, and content lets developers 
>>> keep light/dark variants co-located and consistent with their color 
>>> declarations. Firefox has already shipped this behavior. Aligning with the 
>>> CSS Color 5 spec and Firefox removes an interoperability gap and reduces 
>>> friction for developers building adaptive UIs. 
>>>
>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>> *No information provided*
>>>
>>> *TAG review*
>>> *No information provided* 
>>>
>>> *TAG review status*
>>> Not applicable
>>>
>>> *Goals for experimentation*
>>> None 
>>>
>>> *Risks*
>>>
>>>
>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>> *No information provided* 
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023569)
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/658)
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? 
>>> *No information provided* 
>>>
>>>
>>> *Debuggability*
>>> *No information provided* 
>>>
>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>> Yes 
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-color/light-dark-image-none.html 
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-color/light-dark-image-none-interpolation.html
>>>  
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-properties-values-api/register-property-syntax-parsing.html
>>>  
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-color/light-dark-image.html
>>>
>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>> *No information provided* 
>>>
>>> *Finch feature name*
>>> CSSLightDarkImage 
>>>
>>> *Rollout plan*
>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>
>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>> False
>>>
>>> *Tracking bug*
>>> https://crbug.com/491829958
>>>
>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>> Shipping on desktop 150 
>>> Shipping on Android 150 
>>> Shipping on WebView 150 
>>> Shipping on iOS 150 
>>>
>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way). 
>>> *No information provided*
>>>
>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5123253146353664?gate=6509279727190016
>>>
>>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>> Intent to Prototype: 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/69bb9df7.050a0220.1a988.00b8.GAE%40google.com
>>>
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/45a24970-8208-4b4e-b7fa-f594aa2d390bn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to