LGTM1

On Wednesday, September 9, 2026 at 2:03:54 AM UTC-4 Chromestatus wrote:

> *Contact emails*
> [email protected], [email protected]
>
> *Explainer*
>
> https://github.com/w3c/window-management/blob/main/EXPLAINER_additional_windowing_controls.md
>
> *Specification*
> https://www.w3.org/TR/window-management/#api-window-minimize-method 
>
> *Summary*
> Enables web applications with the window-management permission to 
> maximize(), minimize(), and restore() their windows, and to prevent 
> resizing through setResizable(). Additionally, new CSS media features 
> display-state and resizable enable scripts and content to adapt to the 
> respective window states and resizability. These features improve the 
> usability of VDI remote application windows in Web clients, especially when 
> it comes to titlebar window controls. The new functionality enhances 
> existing Window Management API features: 
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5252960583942144 
>
> *Blink component*
> Blink>WindowDialog 
> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EWindowDialog%22>
>
> *Web Feature ID*
> window-management <https://webstatus.dev/features/window-management> 
>
> *Motivation*
> Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) web clients have limited abilities to 
> integrate remote application windows with the local desktop environment, 
> which creates suboptimal experiences for their users. Currently, they can 
> only present full disjoint remote desktop environments (e.g. in a local 
> fullscreen window), or present individual remote applications in separate 
> local windows with titlebar window controls that are inoperative, 
> redundant, and confusing for users. 
>
> *Initial public proposal*
> https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-additional-windowing-controls/6044
>
> *TAG review*
> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1246 
>
> *TAG review status*
> Pending
>
> *Goals for experimentation*
>
>
> *Risks*
>
>
> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
> *No information provided* 
>
> *Gecko*: No signal (
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/712)
>
> *WebKit*: No signal (
> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/96)
>
> *Web developers*: Positive (
> https://github.com/w3c/window-management/issues/3) From VDI web client 
> partners (Citrix & VMware) - the feature is needed by them for single 
> application streaming using web technologies. 
> https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-virtual-apps-desktops/seamless.html 
> https://github.com/w3c/window-management/issues/158
>
> *Other signals*:
>
> *Ergonomics*
> Permissions API status queries and CSS Media Queries provide feature 
> support detection, display mode queries represent whether the features are 
> viable in the current window. The window-state feature would pair nicely 
> with a proposed `application-context` CSS media feature to resolve 
> ambiguities of the `display-mode` media feature when a standalone Web App 
> window enters fullscreen: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/1218 This 
> enhancement fits naturally with the Window Management API, and display 
> state control methods are straightforward. This enhancement is especially 
> useful when paired with Unframed display mode for Isolated Web Apps: 
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5551475195904000 The API should not have 
> any performance impact and state transitions are not expected to occur 
> frequently.
>
> *Activation*
> The API is fairly simple and utilizes concepts already present in existing 
> operating systems. It's a reasonable progressive enhancement expected to be 
> especially useful for VDI remote application windows.
>
> *Security*
> Permission and user activation requirements mitigate primary risks: - 
> Focus stealing by a malicious application - Malicious applications hiding 
> from the user - Application changing the display state in a loop 
>
> *WebView application risks*
>
> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? 
> No - the feature is not supported on WebView. 
>
>
> *Debuggability*
> The feature has basic support provided automatically by DevTools. 
>
> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
> No 
> Launch support: Initially planned for ChromeOS. Windows, Mac and Linux 
> planned for fast-follow. Support is not yet planned for Android or Android 
> WebView, but should be feasible for Android freeform windowing modes. 
>
> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
> No 
> Full automated WPT coverage is not currently possible, because the feature 
> is only applicable to standalone PWA windows. Initial limited coverage can 
> be found at: 
> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/mediaqueries/display-state.tentative.html 
> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/mediaqueries/resizable.tentative.html 
> https://wpt.fyi/results/window-management/additional-windowing-controls.tentative.https.html
>
> *Flag name on about://flags*
> enable-desktop-pwas-additional-windowing-controls 
>
> *Finch feature name*
> DesktopPWAsAdditionalWindowingControls 
>
> *Rollout plan*
> Will ship enabled for all users
>
> *Requires code in //chrome?*
> True
>
> *Tracking bug*
> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40192345
>
> *Launch bug*
> https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4234439
>
> *Measurement*
> window.minimize() - 
> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4761 
> window.maximize() - 
> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4762 
> window.restore() - 
> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4763 
> window.setResizable() - 
> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4764
>
> *Estimated milestones*
> Shipping on desktop 155 
> DevTrial on desktop 122 
>
> *Anticipated spec changes*
>
> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
> the API in a non-backward-compatible way). 
> *No information provided*
>
> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5201832664629248?gate=5182130005475328
>
> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
> Intent to Prototype: 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/oCxWg8q_OQY
> Ready for Trial: 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/49DBcMFjU9Q
>
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/a2fe5d3e-2a10-4dc6-b3df-4ee0d089b060n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to