On Wednesday, October 7, 2026 at 10:56:20 AM UTC-4 Chromestatus wrote:

*Contact emails*
[email protected]

*Specification*
https://w3c.github.io/resource-timing 

*Summary*
For cross-origin resources, require that a resources is fetched with CORS 
for it to show its encoded/decoded body sizes as well as transferSize. For 
encodedBodySize/decodedBodySize this would replace the Timing-Allow-Origin 
gate, while transferSize would require both. 

*Blink component*
Blink>PerformanceAPIs>ResourceTiming 
<https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EPerformanceAPIs%3EResourceTiming%22>

*Web Feature ID*
resource-timing <https://webstatus.dev/features/resource-timing> 

*Motivation*
It was realized a while ago that when a resource opts-in to 
"Timing-Allow-Origin" it should only opt-in to information that is clearly 
related to *timing*. Body sizes, as well as the existing CORS-protected 
attributes like responseStatus, contentType and contentEncoding, tell more 
about the content of the resource than about the process of fetching it. 

*Initial public proposal*
*No information provided*

*TAG review*
*No information provided* 

*TAG review status*
Not applicable

*Goals for experimentation*
None 

*Risks*


*Interoperability and Compatibility*
*No information provided* 

*Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping

*WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping WebKit only exposes body sizes for same-origin 
resources, so they are more strict than this.

*Web developers*: No signals

*Other signals*:

*WebView application risks*

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? 
*No information provided* 


*Debuggability*
*No information provided* 

*Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
No


I assume this is available on all six Blink platforms? Could you check that 
box
 


*Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
<https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
No 


Why not? I think there should be WPTs to ensure we can get to interop. Is 
that possible to add?
 


*Flag name on about://flags*
*No information provided* 

*Finch feature name*
ResourceTimingUseCORSForBodySizes 

*Rollout plan*
Will ship enabled for all users

*Requires code in //chrome?*
False

*Tracking bug*
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40251936

*Estimated milestones*
Shipping on desktop158 Shipping on Android158 Shipping on WebView158 

*Anticipated spec changes*

Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
the API in a non-backward-compatible way). 
*No information provided*

*Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5195340595724288?gate=6079863659298816

This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
<https://chromestatus.com>. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/8cf94ba5-5c92-4ff1-b959-0bca881f522fn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to