Looks good to me, but is there any reason this PR can't land now?

On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 5:35 PM Alex Russell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> LGTM1; this is an awesome addition. Thanks for making it happen.
>
> On TAG review, can you please send an FYI?
>
> Best,
>
> Alex
>
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2026 at 2:47:22 PM UTC+1 Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>> *Contact emails*
>> [email protected]
>>
>> *Explainer*
>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30#issue-3828859369
>>
>> *Specification*
>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30
>>
>> *Summary*
>> Add `styleDuration` and `forcedStyleDuration` information to the Long
>> Animation Frame API, enabling developers to distinguish style and layout
>> times.
>>
>> *Blink component*
>> Blink>PerformanceAPIs
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EPerformanceAPIs%22>
>>
>> *Web Feature ID*
>> Missing feature -
>> https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/issues/4453
>>
>> *Motivation*
>> Currently performance-conscious developers have no way to distinguish
>> their style time from their layout time, making CSS performance issues less
>> actionable than they can be. This feature enables developers to make that
>> distinction.
>>
>> *Initial public proposal*
>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30
>>
>> *TAG review*
>> I didn't file for a TAG review as these are a few new attributes that
>> break up the timings provided by an existing attribute, mimicking its
>> existing shape. I don't expect the TAG to have strong opinions on the shape
>> of the attributes.
>>
>> *TAG review status*
>> Not applicable
>>
>> *Origin Trial Name*
>> Long Animation Frames - separate style and layout durations
>>
>> *Goals for experimentation*
>> See that the new attributes provide useful data to developers as they
>> debug their CSS performance issues.
>>
>> *Chromium Trial Name*
>> LongAnimationFrameStyleDuration
>>
>> *Link to origin trial feedback summary*
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/qvGqBcSOFTQ/m/rU6rqKuMCAAJ
>>
>> *Origin Trial documentation link*
>> https://github.com/w3c/long-animation-frames/pull/30#issue-3828859369
>>
>> *WebFeature UseCounter name*
>> kLongAnimationFrameTimingStyleDuration
>>
>> *Risks*
>>
>>
>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>> *As these are new attributes, I don't expect them to have any compat
>> impact. As far as interop goes, I'd expect that when other engines adopt
>> LoAF, they'd also adopt these attributes.*
>>
>> *Gecko*: No signal
>> Positive on the broader LoAF:
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/929
>> I'm asking if I should file a more specific issue for these extra
>> attributes.
>>
>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/283)
>> No signal for the broader LoAF feature. Unlikely they'd have a strong
>> position on these attributes.
>>
>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/qvGqBcSOFTQ/m/5DCTOu9KCgAJ
>> )
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>
>> *WebView application risks*
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>> *No information provided*
>>
>>
>> *Debuggability*
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>> Yes
>>
>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>> Yes
>>
>>  - https://wpt.fyi/results/long-animation-frame/loaf-style-duration.html:
>> styleDuration (9 subtests)
>>  - https://wpt.fyi/results/long-animation-frame/loaf-layout-duration.html:
>> layoutDuration (7 subtests)
>>  -
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/long-animation-frame/loaf-forced-style-duration.html:
>> forcedStyleDuration (4 subtests)
>>  -
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/long-animation-frame/loaf-forced-layout-duration.html:
>> forcedLayoutDuration, including checking that forced style plus forced
>> layout
>>    adds up to forcedStyleAndLayoutDuration (5 subtests)
>>  -
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/long-animation-frame/loaf-container-queries.html:
>> all four attributes when container queries mix style and layout work (6
>> subtests)
>>  - https://wpt.fyi/results/long-animation-frame/loaf-toJSON.html: now
>> also checks styleDuration and layoutDuration in toJSON()
>>
>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *Finch feature name*
>> LongAnimationFrameStyleDuration
>>
>> *Rollout plan*
>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>
>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>> False
>>
>> *Tracking bug*
>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/476826067
>>
>> *Estimated milestones*
>> Shipping on desktop 157
>> Origin trial desktop first 148
>> Origin trial desktop last 153
>> Shipping on Android 157
>> Shipping on WebView 157
>>
>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>
>> *No changes expected.*
>>
>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5171478175809536?gate=6516503656660992
>>
>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>> Intent to Prototype:
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSJxRuMp6Ha5RVCjzNfsG0Sj96Y%3Dgy9LnxtM%2Brq-S6DEew%40mail.gmail.com
>> Intent to Experiment:
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSJ2PJ0dZxYH48PALOSUenSSV7VuZ9CzTHnGd8u_jTKkcg%40mail.gmail.com
>>
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9403784c-3fb5-47a6-b288-d6c4c26945bdn%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9403784c-3fb5-47a6-b288-d6c4c26945bdn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY9J8Z4ioi2THdUB2270Qdj1PdpEmPa%3DHDH5k0zCGhO4AA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to