Hi Hadriel;
As far as I know there was no clear consensus on the way forward of
this draft,
and as you may recall, there was as much of an opposition as there was
support
to work on this.
Only thing I believe we agreed on was that, if we were to discuss
the draft,
we were to use BLISS mailing list until we know what we are doing.
Regards
Shida
On 13-Mar-09, at 3:48 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Hi Marianne and BLISS Chairs,
Why was this submitted as an individual-draft again and not a
Working-Group draft?
Didn't we have consensus in Dublin to make this a BLISS WG Item?
If we want to make History-Info the new white meat, we have to
provide a transition mechanism. That transition mechanism can
either be done differently by every system, or be done the same way.
-hadriel
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 7:38 AM
To: [email protected]
A new version of the draft-mohali-diversion-history-info is
available at
the following URL :
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mohali-diversion-history-info-
01.txt
Note that interworking between Diversion header and Voicemail URI
has been
added in addition to interworking from Diversion header to History-
Info
header.
Regards,
Marianne.
_______________________________________________
BLISS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
