On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:38 +0200, Luca MUSCARIELLO wrote: > Then, I feel like FQ is a bad name to call this "newFQ". > It's an implementation of a fair TCP pacer. Which is very useful, but FQ > is kind of misleading, IMHO.
No problem, feel free to send a patch. I am very bad at choosing names. _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
