On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote: > The link below doesn't work anymore; a slighly updated version is at: > http://riteproject.eu/?attachment_id=735
0) I enjoyed reading it, but it wasn't as comprehensive as I'd like, and more than a few paragraphs reflected a bias that I'd have liked to have had an opportunity to address before publication. 1) I would like a future version to dedicate a bit of space to "Byte Queue Limits" (BQL), as that happens to have been the technology that has made all the AQM and FQ algorithms scalable to 10s of gbits in Linux. Prior to BQL, NO aqm or FQ worked right at line rate. I have kept hoping some paper would examine the difference in latency due to BQL for quite some time now... if it wasn't for the BQL breakthrough: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/2011-November/000726.html The bufferbloat.net project would have folded up shop and quit that year, if BQL hadn't arrived, as our initial focus on fixing wifi wasn't working out. The BQL concept and implementation are delightfully simple and fast enough to run at interrupt cleanup time. http://lwn.net/Articles/454390/ And the results, spectacular, particularly on hosts with TSO or GSO enabled, and at a wide range of rates, particularly high ones. 2) The same person that did Data Center TCP went off to do pfabric. I don't see that in here. 3) Also HFSC seems to be widely used, in the DSL market in particular, and is not in here. 4) Numerous other nits. I do hope further input from the community is solicited for a 1.1, and I'd love it if it were available as a wiki or html document one day for easier browsing/decoding/searching from the Internet. > > On 21. juli 2014, at 11:17, David Ros wrote: > > Hi all, > > The following paper may be of interest to ICCRGers: > > "Reducing Internet Latency: A Survey of Techniques and their Merits" > > available here: > http://riteproject.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/latency_preprint-31.pdf > > This is a much-extended version (understatement) of a position paper of ours > that was presented in last year's ISOC workshop on Internet latency. > > It's currently under submission to a journal, so this preprint will be > slightly amended for the eventual journal version that in principle should > be available in a few months. Comments will be gladly welcome. > > Thanks, > > David (as individual, on behalf of all the authors) > > _______________________________________________ > iccrg mailing list > ic...@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg > > > > _______________________________________________ > iccrg mailing list > ic...@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg > -- Dave Täht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat