I don't suppose anyone has set up a lab containing several hundred wireless clients and a number of APs? A stepping stone towards that would be a railway carriage simulator, with one AP, a simulated 3G uplink, and a couple of dozen clients.
I wonder how well simply putting fq on each of the clients and fq_codel on the APs would work. My general impression is that fq is the right default choice for end hosts (which are generally not at the bottleneck) and fq_codel is the right default choice for bottleneck routers. A typical consumer router/AP might see the bottleneck for both directions, though not necessarily at the same time. - Jonathan Morton
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
