Hi Jonathan,
On Apr 19, 2015, at 19:41 , Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19 Apr, 2015, at 19:30, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Frequency readouts are probably more accessible to the latter.
>>
>> The frequency domain more accessible to laypersons? I have my doubts ;)
>
> Gamers, at least, are familiar with “frames per second” and how that
> corresponds to their monitor’s refresh rate.
I am sure they can easily transform back into time domain to get the
frame period ;) . I am partly kidding, I think your idea is great in that it
is a truly positive value which could lend itself to being used in ISP/router
manufacturer advertising, and hence might work in the real work; on the other
hand I like to keep data as “raw” as possible (not that ^(-1) is a
transformation worthy of being called data massage).
> The desirable range of latencies, when converted to Hz, happens to be roughly
> the same as the range of desirable frame rates.
Just to play devils advocate, the interesting part is time or saving
time so seconds or milliseconds are also intuitively understandable and can be
easily added ;)
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
