On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:26:27PM +0000, luca.muscarie...@orange.com wrote: > BTW if a paced flow from Google shares a bloated buffer with a non paced > flow from a non Google server, doesn't this turn out to be a performance > penalty for the paced flow?
Nope. The paced flow puts less strain on the buffer (and hooray for that), which is a win no matter if the buffer is contended or not. > fq_codel gives incentives to do pacing but if it's not deployed what's the > performance gain of using pacing? fq_codel doesn't give any specific incentive to do pacing. In fact, if absolutely all devices on your path would use fq_codel and have adequate buffers, I believe pacing would be largely a no-op. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat