On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:49 AM Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 5 Jun, 2018, at 10:44 am, Mario Hock <mario.h...@kit.edu> wrote: > > > > Just to make sure that I got your answer correctly. The benefit for > > endsystems comes from the "fq" (flow queuing) part, not from the "codel" > > part of fq_codel? > > That's a fair characterisation, yes. > > In fact, even for middleboxes, the "flow isolation" semantics of FQ have the > most impact on reducing inter-flow induced latency. The "codel" part (AQM) > helps with intra-flow latency, which is usually much less important once flow > isolation is in place, but is still worth having.
So, jonathan, this portion of the debate leaked over into https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9725 And I lost a great deal of hair over it. the codel portion is way worth it on "end-systems". > > - Jonathan Morton > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat -- Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619 _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
