On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 7:51 AM Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Dave Taht wrote: > > > I guess my biggest question is how bloated is the "Before cake" > > version of the link? > > Not very. > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/41693199
Kind of hard to argue with that. However I tend to think dslreports and browsers start to give inaccurate tests at these speeds. Got rrul available? The closest flent server I have to you is in germany. I also agree that, man, the base difference in "getting on" a fiber network is really something you can feel. - 2ms vs 10+... you can complete a short transaction before one can even start, on cable. To me, this is probably the biggest perceptual difference between cable and fiber behavior (more important than fixing bloat) I miss being on sonic. And I didn't know, until recently, that my modem was on badmodems.com's list. > I then did another test while at the same time doing a different vendor > speedtest: > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/41693256 > > Ping just increased 5-10 ms when doing this. > > If I then re-enable cake with 250000/100000 I get: > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/41693346 I don't "get" the knee in the download curve here and the prior test. > > qdisc after this last test: > > qdisc cake 8034: dev eth1.2 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 100Mbit besteffort > triple-isolate nonat nowash no-ack-filter split-gso rtt 100.0ms raw > overhead 0 > Sent 391610860 bytes 650447 pkt (dropped 1430, overlimits 645558 requeues > 0) > backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 > memory used: 2425408b of 5000000b > capacity estimate: 100Mbit > min/max network layer size: 46 / 1514 > min/max overhead-adjusted size: 46 / 1514 > average network hdr offset: 14 > > Tin 0 > thresh 100Mbit > target 5.0ms > interval 100.0ms > pk_delay 82us > av_delay 6us > sp_delay 1us > backlog 0b > pkts 651877 > bytes 393761357 > way_inds 11602 > way_miss 3103 > way_cols 0 > drops 1430 > marks 0 > ack_drop 0 > sp_flows 16 > bk_flows 1 > un_flows 0 > max_len 18168 > quantum 1514 > > qdisc ingress ffff: dev eth1.2 parent ffff:fff1 ---------------- > Sent 896042971 bytes 760157 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) > backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 > qdisc fq_codel 0: dev tun2025 root refcnt 2 limit 10240p flows 1024 > quantum 1514 target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms memory_limit 4Mb ecn > Sent 21580 bytes 166 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) > backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 > maxpacket 0 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 0 ecn_mark 0 > new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0 > qdisc cake 8035: dev ifb4eth1.2 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 250Mbit besteffort > triple-isolate nonat nowash no-ack-filter split-gso rtt 100.0ms raw > overhead 0 > Sent 912501460 bytes 754253 pkt (dropped 5904, overlimits 926439 requeues > 0) > backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 > memory used: 805712b of 12500000b > capacity estimate: 250Mbit > min/max network layer size: 60 / 1514 > min/max overhead-adjusted size: 60 / 1514 > average network hdr offset: 14 > > Tin 0 > thresh 250Mbit > target 5.0ms > interval 100.0ms > pk_delay 650us > av_delay 429us > sp_delay 1us > backlog 0b > pkts 760157 > bytes 921432581 > way_inds 17426 > way_miss 3168 > way_cols 0 > drops 5904 > marks 0 > ack_drop 0 > sp_flows 7 > bk_flows 1 > un_flows 0 > max_len 15104 > quantum 1514 > > > it seems to smoothe out the flows better than my ISP shaper. > > These tests are done when rest of people in the household was also using > Internet for other things, so not "clean room". > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat