Everybody, calm down. I put this out merely to get comment before we submitted the first of several drafts. That draft is now submitted and we've asked for a talk slot in the tsvwg for it. I cc'd the world to get quick initial feedback, and I want to shut this overbroad conversation down and move it to just the ecn-sane mailing list.
The l4s mailing list is dead, and the debates on the AQM mailing list and here, unhelpful - for decades. So, back in august I started a new working group here, under house rules that I thought would be more productive, and asked that people that wanted to debate ecn more sanely, join. few did. And jon and I have been working for months (and largely not on the list) to try and create a compromise proposal of which y'all just saw the first output. There's more in the bufferbloat-rfcs repo. The rules for joining the ecn-sane list are simple - take the time to step back and write a write a short position paper, and join (or create) a team. You needn't do that immediately. If you disagree with the rules of operation of the ecn-sane working group, submit a pull request or file a bug on the web site. where we can discuss it. Ironically our ssl cert just expired and I don't remember how to fix it. Please join the ecn-sane mailing list for discussing this stuff and stop cc-ing the whole bufferbloat.net world on it, please. _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat