Hi Dave, fun fact, the draft is titled "Identifying and Handling Non Queue Building Flows in a Bottleneck Link". To which the _only_ and obvious answer is one does this by by observing flow-behavior on the element that egresses into the bottleneck link. Case closed, Nothing to see folks, you can go home... ;) (I have started to read this thing ages ago and blissfully forgot all about it, time to read it agian?)
Best Regards Sebastian > On Aug 24, 2019, at 16:57, Dave Taht <d...@taht.net> wrote: > > > I decided that perhaps it would be best if we tried harder > to live within the ietf's processes for calm, reasoned discussion > > But in trying to review this internet draft... > > https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-white-tsvwg-nqb-02.html > > I couldn't help myself, and my review is here: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/hZGjm899t87YZl9JJUOWQq4KBsk > > If someone could make something constructive out of that, great. It > would be good to have a really clear definition of what we mean by > sparse, and good definition and defense on our website of the properties > and benefits of fair queueing. > > And I'm going to go off today and try to do something nice for a small > animal, a widow, or an orphan. Maybe plant some flowers. > > Some days it doesn't pay to read your accrued inbox messages. Today > was one of them. You needen't read mine either! > _______________________________________________ > Ecn-sane mailing list > ecn-s...@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat