On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:21 AM Luca Muscariello <muscarie...@ieee.org> wrote: > > A Bloom filter based classifier for Bottlenecked vs non bottlenecked flows > was done in here in 2005. > > https://team.inria.fr/rap/files/2013/12/KMOR05a.pdf > > And associated patent granted since 2011 > > https://patents.google.com/patent/US7933204B2/en?oq=US7933204B2+United+States++
I guess they've licensed the related patents here. You missed the "strict priority queue" part... there's nothing in here that explicitly gives "classic" traffic a means to not starve.... one part thereof, of many. "Otherwise, this exemplary embodiment enables system configuration to discard the low-priority packet tail, and transmit the high-priority packet instead, without waiting." > Luca > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 3:29 AM Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I don't normally read patents, but, this one is pretty cable modem >> specific and reads better than the related internet drafts.The >> interaction with maps scheduling is well described. >> >> https://patents.google.com/patent/US10523577B2/en >> >> Of particular irony is the misspelt "fear/flow cueing" and I had >> suggested a bloom fillter in all innocence when some of these ideas >> were first discussed. >> >> There are a few other patents cited of interest. >> >> -- >> Make Music, Not War >> >> Dave Täht >> CTO, TekLibre, LLC >> http://www.teklibre.com >> Tel: 1-831-435-0729 >> _______________________________________________ >> Ecn-sane mailing list >> ecn-s...@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane -- Make Music, Not War Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-435-0729 _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat