Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote:
> of the sending rate, no? BBRv2 as I understand it will happily run
> roughshod over any true rfc3168 AQM on the path, I do not have the
> numbers, but I am not fully convinced that typically the most
> significant throttling on a CDN to end-user path happens still inside
> the CDN's data center...That's an interesting claim. I'm in no position to defend or refute it. If it's true, though, it suggests some interesting solutions, because one can more easily establish trust relationships within the data-center. I'm specifically imagining a clock signal from the Top-of-Rack switch to the senders. Actually, it's not a clock, so much as a automotive style timing shaft running down through all the 1-U servers, with fine vernier adjustments :-) I'm also certain we've seen such technology before. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
