Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> writes: > I am confident that this device will happily run CoDel and even > fq_codel close to line-rate, as codel/fq_codel have a relative modest > processing cost.
Yeah, the overhead of CoDel itself (and even FQ-CoDel) is basically nil (as in, we have not been able to measure it), when otherwise doing forwarding using the regular Linux stack. As Sebastian says, the source of lower performance when using SQM on some boxes is the traffic shaper, and sometimes the lack of hardware offloads. -Toke _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
