TJason Iannone <jason.iann...@gmail.com> writes: > I ended up cloning the pping repo and running make locally. > > Installing was a few steps: > > 1. mkdir ~/src/libtins/build > 2. cd ~/src/libtins/build > 2. git clone https://github.com/mfontanini/libtins.git > 3. make > 4. sudo make install > 5. cd ~/src > 6. git clone https://github.com/pollere/pping.git > 7. cd pping > 8. make > 9. ./pping > > The promise of this, as Kathleen Nichols points out, is that we can > passively monitor production flows to get a novel sense of end to end > performance per flow. I don't know of any other passive monitoring > technique, beyond a port mirror + a whole gang of systems, that can provide > this level of detail. Please enlighten me if I'm wrong. The only other > passive monitoring mechanisms I'm aware of are SNMP polling, IPFIX/*Flow, > and Streaming Telemetry Interface. None of those systems provide end to end > flow performance details. The standard in-band active monitoring tools are > good for determining node to node and full path metrics, but this provides > a more complete picture of end to end performance beyond active > y.1731/802.3ag/OAM probes. I'm a little surprised that I'm only learning > about it now.
What's your use case? :) -Toke _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat