Hi All, We are getting there...
'The average latency of all tests performed in the tile, represented in milliseconds' This is infinitely better than no under-load numbers. However, the latency distribution is neither 'normal'* nor fully symmetric (it can not, there is a hard minimum, the minimal path RTT and a hard maximum (icmp timeout) even though the distribution will likely be closer to the minimum than the maximum)**. Next improvement possibility: they report averages and number of tests, but no measure of variance... To put a positive spin on it, reporting luli numbers at all is great, as is the potential to improve the reporting quality with small additions! Regards Sebastian *) Which is not a showstopper per se as long as the distribution is unimodal and not too skewed then the average is still intuitively interpretable, but is it? **) My gut feeling is a beta distribution could be fitted to the data and that functions control parameters reported to better model the expected distribution shape. P.S.: This time without links to test what triggers getting blocked... _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat