Is there a VMWARE NSX approach to reducing the O&M costs by at least 1/2 for the FiWi head end systems?
For power: My approach to the Boston historic neighborhood where my kids now live would be AC wired CPE treated as critical, life support infrastructure. But better may be to do as modern garage door openers and have standard AC charge a battery so one can operate even during power outages.
https://www.rsandrews.com/blog/hardwired-battery-powered-smoke-alarms-you/ Our Recommendation: Hardwired Smoke AlarmsHardwired smoke alarms, while they require slightly more work upfront, are the clear choice if you’re considering replacing your home’s smoke alarm system. You’ll hardly ever have to deal with the annoying “chirping” that occurs when a battery-powered smoke detector begins to go dead, and your entire family will be alerted in the event that a fire does occur since hardwire smoke detectors can be interconnected.
Bob
Hi Dave,On Mar 17, 2023, at 17:38, Dave Taht via Starlink <starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:This is a pretty neat box: https://mikrotik.com/product/netpower_lite_7r What are the compelling arguments for fiber vs copper, again?As far as I can tell: Copper: can carry electric power Fiber-PON: much farther reach even without amplifiers (10 Km, 20 Km, ... depending on loss budget) cheaper operation (less active power needed by the headend/OLT) less space need than all active alternatives (AON, copper ethernet) likely only robust passive components in the field Existing upgrade path for 25G and 50G is on the horizon over the same PON infrastructure mostly resistant to RF ingress along the path (as long as a direct lightning hit does not melt the glas ;) ) Fiber-Ethernet: like fiber-PON but no density advantage (needs 1 port per end device) even wider upgrade paths I guess it really depends on how important "carry electric power" is to you ;) feeding these from the client side is pretty cool for consenting adults, but I would prefer not having to pay the electric bill for my ISPs active gear in the field outside the CPE/ONT... Regards SebastianOn Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:10 AM Mike Puchol via Rpm <r...@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:Hi Bob,You hit on a set of very valid points, which I'll complement with my views on where the industry (the bit of it that affects WISPs) is heading, and what I saw at the MWC in Barcelona. Love the FiWi term :-)I have seen the vendors that supply WISPs, such as Ubiquiti, Cambium, and Mimosa, but also newer entrants such as Tarana, increase the performance and on-paper specs of their equipment. My examples below are centered on the African market, if you operate in Europe or the US, where you can charge customers a higher install fee, or even charge them a break-up fee if they don't return equipment, the economics work.Where currently a ~$500 sector radio could serve ~60 endpoints, at a cost of ~$50 per endpoint (I use this term in place of ODU/CPE, the antenna that you mount on the roof), and supply ~2.5 Mbps CIR per endpoint, the evolution is now a ~$2,000+ sector radio, a $200 endpoint, capability for ~150 endpoints per sector, and ~25 Mbps CIR per endpoint.If every customer a WISP installs represents, say, $100 CAPEX at install time ($50 for the antenna + cabling, router, etc), and you charge a $30 install fee, you have $70 to recover, and you recover from the monthly contribution the customer makes. If the contribution after OPEX is, say, $10, it takes you 7 months to recover the full install cost. Not bad, doable even in low-income markets.Fast-forward to the next-generation version. Now, the CAPEX at install is $250, you need to recover $220, and it will take you 22 months, which is above the usual 18 months that investors look for.The focus, thereby, has to be the lever that has the largest effect on the unit economics - which is the per-customer cost. I have drawn what my ideal FiWi network would look like:<Hybrid EPON-Wireless network.png>Taking you through this - we start with a 1-port, low-cost EPON OLT (or you could go for 2, 4, 8 ports as you add capacity). This OLT has capacity for 64 ONUs on its single port. Instead of connecting the typical fiber infrastructure with kilometers of cables which break, require maintenance, etc. we insert an EPON to Ethernet converter (I added "magic" because these don't exist AFAIK).This converter allows us to connect our $2k sector radio, and serve the $200 endpoints (ODUs) over wireless point-to-multipoint up to 10km away. Each ODU then has a reverse converter, which gives us EPON again.Once we are back on EPON, we can insert splitters, for example, pre-connectorized outdoor 1:16 boxes. Every customer install now involves a 100 meter roll of pre-connectorized 2-core drop cable, and a $20 EPON ONU.Using this deployment method, we could connect up to 16 customers to a single $200 endpoint, so the enpoint CAPEX per customer is now $12.5. Add the ONU, cable, etc. and we have a per-install CAPEX of $82.5 (assuming the same $50 of extras we had before), and an even shorter break-even. In addition, as the endpoints support higher capacity, we can provision at least the same, if not more, capacity per customer.Other advantages: the $200 ODU is no longer customer equipment and CAPEX, but network equipment, and as such, can operate under a longer break-even timeline, and be financed by infrastructure PE funds, for example. As a result, churn has a much lower financial impact on the operator.The main reason why this wouldn't work today is that EPON, as we know, is synchronous, and requires the OLT to orchestrate the amount of time each ONU can transmit, and when. Having wireless hops and media conversions will introduce latencies which can break down the communications (e.g. one ONU may transmit, get delayed on the radio link, and end up overlapping another ONU that transmitted on the next slot). Thus, either the "magic" box needs to account for this, or an new hybrid EPON-wireless protocol developed.My main point here: the industry is moving away from the unconnected. All the claims I heard and saw at MWC about "connecting the unconnected" had zero resonance with the financial drivers that the unconnected really operate under, on top of IT literacy, digital skills, devices, power...Best, MikeOn Mar 14, 2023 at 05:27 +0100, rjmcmahon via Starlink <starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net>, wrote:To change the topic - curious to thoughts on FiWi. Imagine a world with no copper cable called FiWi (Fiber,VCSEL/CMOS Radios, Antennas) and which is point to point inside a building connected to virtualized APs fiber hops away. Each remote radio head(RRH) would consume 5W or less and only when active. No need for things like zigbee, or meshes, or threads as each radio has a fiber connectionvia Corning's actifi or equivalent. Eliminate the AP/Client power imbalance. Plastics also can house smoke or other sensors. Some reminders from Paul Baran in 1994 (and from David Reed) o) Shorter range rf transceivers connected to fiber could produce a significant improvement - - tremendous improvement, really.o) a mixture of terrestrial links plus shorter range radio links has theeffect of increasing by orders and orders of magnitude the amount of frequency spectrum that can be made available. o) By authorizing high power to support a few users to reach slightly longer distances we deprive ourselves of the opportunity to serve the many. o) Communications systems can be built with 10dB ratio o) Digital transmission when properly done allows a small signal to noise ratio to be used successfully to retrieve an error free signal. o) And, never forget, any transmission capacity not used is wasted forever, like water over the dam. Not using such techniques represent lost opportunity. And on waveguides: o) "Fiber transmission loss is ~0.5dB/km for single mode fiber, independent of modulation" o) “Copper cables and PCB traces are very frequency dependent. At 100Gb/s, the loss is in dB/inch."o) "Free space: the power density of the radio waves decreases with the square of distance from the transmitting antenna due to spreading of theelectromagnetic energy in space according to the inverse square law" The sunk costs & long-lived parts of FiWi are the fiber and the CPEplastics & antennas, as CMOS radios+ & fiber/laser, e.g. VCSEL could be pluggable, allowing for field upgrades. Just like swapping out SFP in adata center. This approach basically drives out WiFi latency by eliminating sharedqueues and increases capacity by orders of magnitude by leveraging 10dB in the spatial dimension, all of which is achieved by a physical design.Just place enough RRHs as needed (similar to a pop up sprinkler in an irrigation system.)Start and build this for an MDU and the value of the building improves.Sadly, there seems no way to capture that value other than over long term use. It doesn't matter whether the leader of the HOA tries to capture the value or if a last mile provider tries. The value remains sunk or hidden with nothing on the asset side of the balance sheet.We've got a CAPEX spend that has to be made up via "OPEX returns" overyears. But the asset is there. How do we do this? Bob _______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink_______________________________________________ Rpm mailing list r...@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm -- Come Heckle Mar 6-9 at: https://www.understandinglatency.com/ Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC _______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink_______________________________________________ Rpm mailing list r...@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
