On 5/21/24, 12:19, "Bloat on behalf of Jonathan Morton via Bloat wrote:
> Notice in particular that the only *performance* comparisons they make are > between L4S and no AQM at all, not between L4S and conventional AQM - even > though they now mention that the latter *exists*. I cannot speak to the Nokia deck. But in our field trials we have certainly compared single queue AQM to L4S, and L4S flows perform better. > There's also no mention whatsoever of what happens when L4S traffic meets a > conventional AQM. We also tested this and all is well; the performance of classic queue with AQM is fine. Jason _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
