#194: Examine workflow for Bloodhound site
------------------------+--------------------
  Reporter:  gjm        |      Owner:  nobody
      Type:  task       |     Status:  new
  Priority:  major      |  Milestone:
 Component:  siteadmin  |    Version:
Resolution:             |   Keywords:
------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by gjm):

 I've been looking into various issues around workflow. One thing that the
 [https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/attachment/ticket/194/opensource-
 workflow.png opensource workflow] is missing for us is capturing aspects
 of review/testing.

 I am not entirely sure that we need anything specific for testing so I
 suggest that we just have a generic review step that is re-entrant in case
 anyone wants to record specific testing to be done by another user. Also,
 I am not proposing that there should be anything to force the ticket to go
 through these steps - it is more so that the ticket can be in an
 appropriate state for others to pick up on.

 So, the rules I am suggesting at the moment are in the
 attachment:new_workflow.ini which should look something like this as a
 graph:
 [[Image(opensource workflow with review.png)]]

 The graph misses a few features like where there is change of ownership
 which I have added to the changes to the infoneeded and review states for
 the moment.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/194#comment:13>
Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker

Reply via email to