Hi,

Based on my quick examination of the problem, I think that we can probably revert to using the unmodified bootstrap with a small change in the way we specify any button bars (setting the data-toggle attribute on the DIV.btn-group instead of DIV.btn-toolbar - see https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/77#comment:11)

Cheers,
    Gary

On 06/13/2012 07:16 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
Looking again, I spotted that this was discussed in https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/49 - I have not fully examined the reasons for the patch and whether we should forward the patch to bootstrap but that still leaves us with the discrepancy.

So, is the change really required? Can we revert to the unmodified bootstrap and adjust our approach?

If the change is required, is it overkill to create a vendor branch so that we can keep track of the limited changes?

Cheers,
    Gary


On 06/13/2012 01:33 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
Hi,

I am about to start committing the patches that Olemis provided for https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/77 but as there are apparently differences creeping in between the vanilla bootstrap code and our version, it might be worth discussing here.

I don't think that this needs to delay work on the original ticket and any required changes can be raised as new tickets.

Cheers,
    Gary

On 06/13/2012 01:24 PM, Apache Bloodhound wrote:
#77: Wrong version of bootstrap in dashboard plugins
------------------------+-------------------------------------
   Reporter:  gjm        |      Owner:  olemis
       Type:  defect     |     Status:  accepted
   Priority:  critical   |  Milestone:  RC1 for initial release
  Component:  dashboard  |    Version:
Resolution:             |   Keywords:
------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by gjm):

Interesting. It is good that the radio behaviour for buttons problem was pointed out as it highlights another aspect of how I am not sure things
  are quite being done right.

In particular, I would prefer that we did not have any custom changes to bootstrap of any kind so that there is a lower chance of making a mistake
  on each upgrade of bootstrap. If it turns out that custom changes are
unavoidable, I would probably go with the vendor branch approach so that
  it is easier to spot how our copy of bootstrap is patched.

  In the meantime I will probably commit the patches from Olemis in the
  current form and we can raise new tickets to deal with any resulting
  issues.




Reply via email to