On 7/16/12, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Gary Martin <[email protected]> > wrote: > [...] > >> Anyway, in the meantime, I thought I should propose that we vote on a >> release. I expect the release to go out with the name >> apache-bloodhound-incubating-0.1, based on the new 0.1 branch. > > Please note that we vote on the actual artifacts rather than what is > sitting in a branch. > > I also noted a commit directly to the branch. For > release/tracking/mgmt purposes, I might suggest only ever committing > to trunk, and branches only get merges from trunk. Thus, we can always > ensure that trunk has all changes. It also helps to keep trunk moving > and cherry pick stuff to the release branch. > > This project is still young, and may not need strong release mgmt > right now, but I would suggest reading: > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html >
interesting ! ... so ... maybe 0.1rc1 should be used instead if strong release management is considered . Did I get this right ? > Skimming is fine, but that page may help people to consider what may > be important for this community. For example, we likely would not > create 0.1.1, but just move onwards to 0.2. Once the project gets > further down its roadmap, then introducing some stronger release > management (and maybe following svn's model) could become more > important. > IMO ... +1 -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
