Just for the record, I have downloaded reviewed the files to my technical ability.
+1 for the release from me. Cheers, Joe On 30 July 2012 10:49, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The 72 hours is well past and so it looks like I have failed to mobilise > the potential vote at this point. I have not looked up the rules associated > with votes that are past their sell-by date, but for now I am prepared to > let the vote continue. > > In case I haven't mentioned this before, I am particularly interested in > the votes of our mentors. Sorry for any pressure that this puts upon them > but If there are any problems with eligibility for release, I am sure they > will spot them. > > Cheers, > Gary > > > > On 25/07/12 21:36, Greg Stein wrote: > >> Here are the instructions that Subversion uses, so it would be >> something similar: >> http://subversion.apache.org/**docs/community-guide/** >> releasing.html#tarball-signing<http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#tarball-signing> >> >> You can see the resulting set of signatures for each tarball; for example: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/release/subversion/** >> subversion-1.7.5.tar.bz2.asc<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/subversion-1.7.5.tar.bz2.asc> >> >> Cheers, >> -g >> >> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Mark Poole <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm currently running this version in production. >>> >>> How would I provide you with my signature to verify the release in >>> future? >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> PPMC members have a "binding" vote (ie. it counts). >>>> >>>> All others can vote, but those are considered advisory or "non-binding". >>>> >>>> People should vote +1 *only* if they have downloaded the tarball and >>>> reviewed it. Including verification of signature(s). In the future, it >>>> would be nice to get additional signatures from those who vote +1, and >>>> attach those signatures to the release. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> -g >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Ian Wild <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Great to see! >>>>> >>>>> Who can vote? >>>>> >>>>> Ian >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ian Wild >>>>> VP Engineering >>>>> WANdisco plc >>>>> >>>>> Mobile +44 (0)7720 093010 >>>>> Office DDI: +44 (0)114 3030472 >>>>> US: +1 925 3801734 >>>>> >>>>> http://www.wandisco.com >>>>> >>>>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy >>>>> http://www.uberSVN.com <http://www.ubersvn.com/> >>>>> >>>>> Everything you need to deploy Subversion in the Enterprise >>>>> http://www.wandisco.com/**subversion<http://www.wandisco.com/subversion> >>>>> < >>>>> >>>> http://www.wandisco.com/**subversion/multisite<http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/multisite> >>>> > >>>> >>>>> Subversion community >>>>> http://www.svnforum.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Gary Martin <[email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I hope that this is not premature but as the conversation on the >>>>>> related >>>>>> [PROPOSAL] thread has died down, I would like to initiate the vote for >>>>>> releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating). If successful this >>>>>> will >>>>>> >>>>> be >>>> >>>>> the first release of the project and is an important step that I hope >>>>>> >>>>> will >>>> >>>>> generate interest in the project and help the community to grow. >>>>>> >>>>>> The release candidate this vote relates to provides: >>>>>> >>>>>> * A patched version of Trac >>>>>> * A new dashboard view with the dashboard style unifying views of >>>>>> tickets, milestones and the user's dashboard. >>>>>> * A re-theming of the interface to use bootstrap >>>>>> * Preliminary multi-product support as a step towards allowing the >>>>>> tracking of multiple distinct products (or projects) in a single >>>>>> environment >>>>>> * Simplified installation with the inclusion of a number of plugins >>>>>> as >>>>>> standard. >>>>>> >>>>>> As an initial release, of particular importance is that we have taken >>>>>> proper notice of licensing of code produced as part of this project >>>>>> and >>>>>> >>>>> the >>>> >>>>> proper acknowledgement of external work packaged with it. >>>>>> >>>>>> The release candidate artifacts consist of source release as a tar.gz >>>>>> archive along with the associated MD5 and GPG signature. These can be >>>>>> >>>>> found >>>> >>>>> at: >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/****dist/dev/incubator/**bloodhound/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/> >>>>>> < >>>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/> >>>> **> >>>> >>>>> Please vote: >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 >>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain) >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours and, if successful, will be followed by >>>>>> a >>>>>> vote on general@incubator for a further 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> > >
