I think that we should point at it ... any reason against that ? On 8/30/12, Apache Bloodhound <[email protected]> wrote: > #153: Updates for next release > ------------------------+----------------------- > Reporter: gjm | Owner: gjm > Type: task | Status: new > Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 2 > Component: installer | Version: > Resolution: | Keywords: > ------------------------+----------------------- > > Comment (by gjm): > > Issues remaining: > * ensure that doc/wireframes is not in a future release > * doc/wireframes are expected to be removed at some point > * doc/html-templates are a similar candidate for removal. > * this requires documentation and (optionally) a distribution script to > remove any unneeded directories, or possibly tweaking our repo structure > * use a top-level README to point to the installer/README.rst > * indicate the revision/release of Trac incorporated > * #157 adds a TRAC_VERSION file - should we point at this or specify it > elsewhere? > > -- > Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153#comment:8> > Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/> > The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker >
-- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
