oh !
ok . I recall we also had another previous conversation about this too
, that's why I suggested doing so .

Definitely workflow states are much more needed , so I think I prefer
keyword + workflow approach too .

On 9/18/12, Joachim Dreimann <[email protected]> wrote:
> This overlaps with two conversations we've had recently on the mailing
> list:
>
> 1. Adding an appropriate tag to 'starter' tickets
> 2. Providing appropriate ticket states, like 'awaiting review / to be
> reviewed' rather than 'open' for the tickets you refer to in your PS.
>
> I prefer those two approaches personally.
>
> - Joe
>
> On 18 Sep 2012, at 18:14, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've been reviewing All Tickets By Milestone [1]_ and maybe these
>> tickets are also good targets just to start .
>>
>>
>> #119         Implement theme extensions code         dashboard       new     
>>                 enhancement
>>      major   nobody  Jun 28, 2012
>> --
>> #18  Change message for self registration    plugins         assigned
>>                      enhancement     major   nobody  Aug 30, 2012
>> --
>> #95  Display of owner in dashboard views should depend on the
>> availability of the field    dashboard       new                     
>> enhancement     major
>>      nobody  Jun 29, 2012
>> --
>> #154         Installer fails when providing repository type without a path
>> and vice versa       installer       new                     defect  major   
>> gjm     Aug 6, 2012
>> --
>> #123         Check functionality of all screens with missing
>> Products/Versions/Milestones/Components      dashboard       new             
>>         task    major
>>      nobody  Jul 13, 2012
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> and maybe this one (not scheduled for release 2 but definitely important
>> ;)
>>
>> #162         Convert version control user interface to Bootstrap     ui 
>> design
>>      assigned                        enhancement     major           Sep 3, 
>> 2012
>> --
>>
>>
>> It's just a suggestion . What do you think ?
>>
>> Towards a more generic discussion I'd point out that maybe we should
>> have a custom field like «difficulty» highlighting prior expectations
>> of the skills needed to complete a task / close a ticket . A query
>> like difficulty=low|moderate could be used to find all such tickets
>> ... and maybe even a link could be added in BloodhoundContribute as
>> well ;)
>>
>> Of course , that should be setup starting from release 3 ... release 2
>> is almost done ;)
>>
>> PS: Many things can be learned by reviewing patches submitted to the
>> isssue tracker as well . Most of the tickets assigned to user olemis
>> will have some . Those scheduled for Release 2 have been baked
>> «recently» ;)
>>
>> .. [1] All Tickets By Milestone - report 6
>>       (https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/report/6)
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:

Reply via email to