On 19.09.2012 11:20, Gary Martin wrote: > On 09/19/2012 09:41 AM, Peter Koželj wrote: >> Hi guys. >> >> Another newbie question. Where should various open tickets be discussed? >> Ticket comments seems natural but that goes to the commits mailing >> list and >> if I understood correctly, such discussions should land in the dev list, >> no? >> >> Peter >> > > Open tickets should really be discussed on the dev list. If you reply > to the ticket message that goes to the commit list then it naturally > goes to the dev list. I think that should be encouraged so that we can > get more decisions made here. On tickets we can provide a link to the > email discussion and maybe provide a summary of the discussion on the > ticket once there is a consensus. > > I think we should make sure we list actual work on the ticket itself - > specifying all the code changes with revision numbers. > > From the point of view of those who cannot commit to the bloodhound > svn repository, at the moment you would have a choice of either adding > patches as attachments to the ticket or sending them directly to the > dev list. When attaching directly to a ticket it would also be best to > follow this up with an email to the dev list. > > Does this sound reasonable?
This sounds just right. With my mentor hat on, I suggest you document this process somewhere in the Wiki, along with coding style requirements, commit log format, etc. -- Brane -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
