On 16/10/12 15:17, Olemis Lang wrote:
On 10/16/12, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
Names for queries/reports sounds reasonable. It is interesting to think
how we might deal with providing wiki links for per-user defined queries.

just like reports links ?

Is that a suggestion or a question? I'm just suggesting that query links that are referred to by a synonym provided by a user may have some interesting issues when attempting to share them. I don't mean to suggest that it is insurmountable of course.


I don't think that we should be repurposing the Reports section, rather
we should be expanding the purpose.
+1

To be able to have graphical
representations of this data, with potentially arbitrary x and y axes
would be great as well.
+1 ... an enhanced version of TracGVizPlugin might help with the part
of potentially arbitrary x and y axis .

I am not sure that users will want their servers to be sending data to google. I think I would prefer to explore other solutions.


It would also be useful to be able to have
reports that allow the setting of a variable, say for specifying a month
so that you can use a single report to generate monthly reporting.

I'm not aware of all details in reports , but afaicr this was already
possible using report vars [1]_ ... isn't it ?

.. [1] TracReports - Using Variables in a Query
         (http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracReports#UsingVariablesinaQuery)


Well, this is only part of the solution. In fact when you try it, at least in bloodhound currently, you require the variable to be set in the querystring. I am pretty much suggesting that we could have a view with a control to provide the ability to set that value.

Cheers,
    Gary

Reply via email to