JFTR ... environment upgrade needed . Is it a big deal ? On 10/16/12, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > That was just updating the copy in vendor/trac/current - I have > subsequently tagged that version appropriately and merged the changes > into trunk/trac which keeps our patches. > > There is only one error that I have noted for which I believe I have > already found a fix. I will commit that in a second and I will update > the list with the commit email for review. > > Cheers, > Gary > > On 16/10/12 17:25, Olemis Lang wrote: >> I think it's the right way to go ... however , our patches have been >> applied in our copy of trac @ trunk ? ... or is it still the previous >> one ? >> >> On 10/16/12, Apache Bloodhound <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch >>> ------------------------+----------------------- >>> Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm >>> Type: task | Status: accepted >>> Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3 >>> Component: trac core | Version: >>> Resolution: | Keywords: vendor >>> ------------------------+----------------------- >>> >>> Comment (by gjm):fixed >>> >>> r1398858 updates vendor/current to trac 1.0 tag (trac:r11307) >>> >>> -- >>> Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:3> >>> Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/> >>> The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker >>> >> > > > -- > Gary Martin > [email protected] > [email protected] > >
-- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
