bh because bd may be confusing ... ;) On 10/26/12, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/10/12 09:19, Ryan Ollos wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: The Trac Project [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 04:47 >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting >>> sample >>> fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox >>> #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample fails in pygments preferences >>> for browsers other than firefox >>> -------------------------------------------+------------------ >>> Reporter: Ryan J Ollos <ryan.j.ollos@…> | Owner: >>> Type: defect | Status: new >>> Priority: normal | Milestone: >>> Component: rendering | Version: >>> Severity: normal | Resolution: >>> Keywords: | >>> -------------------------------------------+------------------ >>> Release Notes: >>> >>> >>> API Changes: >>> >>> -------------------------------------------+------------------ >>> Comment (by cboos): >>> [OT] As the "b" shortcuts are quite popular (#B1, #bn1, #bl1), it was >>> not >>> obvious which one to choose for BloodHound: bh or bd? Pick one or both >>> ;-) >> >> >> I was planning to reply that `bh` is good itertrac prefix for bloodhound >> (in addition to the already existing `bloodhound`). Just wanted to get >> some >> other opinions. >> > > Given that many of us unofficially use and understand bh as bloodhound, > that would seem most useful. Why not? > > Cheers, > Gary >
-- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
