Cool, thanks for the explanations. It actually makes perfect sense. Peter
On 15 November 2012 17:36, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/15/12, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15.11.2012 16:33, Peter Koželj wrote: > >> Maybe I misunderstood how this BEP thing should work. > >> I think that the only correct way of doing this that conforms with > Apache > >> rules would be to discuss things on ML first. BEP is a nice add-on but > >> can > >> not be anything more then a summary of a ML discussion. > >> > > Well , in draft mode not necessarily . Draft proposals are work in > progress so they may be all wrong , and even rejected outright or > after some discussion. A Final BEP **MUST** actually include **ONLY** > what's been agreed upon on the ML , but e.g. diagrams, pictures, mind > maps, as well as very specific details might not reach the ML at all . > the discussion about them , well definitely yes. > ;) > > >> Could be that my interpretation of the ML role is a bit too "strict" :) > > > > The mailing list is the preferred discussion forum, sure. Which does not > > imply that ideas and drafts should never appear anywhere else. > > > > I agree . It is hard to understand a proposal and see it as a whole by > putting all the parts together while reading ML discussion threads , > without knowing whether something is ok or not . That's what proposals > are for . To see the subject as a whole . > ;) > > -- > Regards, > > Olemis. > > Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ > Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ > > Featured article: >
