The other thread "Inline editing of objects" (for the Ticket page) suggest fallback mechanism for javascript disabled browsers. Although this is not directly linked I would rather "advertise" BH as HTML5 UI experience than a no-javascript capable one.
Is anybody aware of any browser that is actually incapable of displaying HTML5 page? Peter On 25 November 2012 20:07, Matevz Bradac <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've started working on #217 - "Make Bloodhound's layout responsive", > based on Joe's html mockup of the ticket page (#240). > I noticed that the HTML output contains a mix of HTML 5 along with > XHTML 1.0, even though the doctype is XHTML 1.0 strict. > As a consequence (some of) the pages don't validate (e.g. > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/240 > ), > and this may be the cause of browsers (mis)behaving and rendering > things differently. > > Is there any general consensus which doctype BH should use? Since > we're using Bootstrap I suppose it would be better to go along > with HTML 5, but I'm not sure how this affects the templating system. > There's a Genshi extension which could be used > (http://code.google.com/p/genshihtml5), > does anyone have any experience with that? > > Cheers, > matevz >
