Hi,
Perhaps it is not that long since the 72nd hour of the vote thread but
is there anything that we can do to encourage those IPMC members who
have not yet voted to review the release and then register their vote?
Cheers,
Gary
On 26/11/12 20:32, Joe Dreimann wrote:
Yes, apologies. Last time I wasn't sure what caused it, now I know it's because
bh-dev was in the to: field.
I'll highlight this in my write up of the release process that I'll publish
soon.
- Joe
________________________
@jdreimann - Twitter
Sent from my phone
On 26 Nov 2012, at 20:27, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote:
Sigh ... got caught out again buy the silly reply-to. These incubator
vote threads shoulg go TO: general@incubator, not to bloodhound-dev and
only cc: general@incubator, or this will happen all the time
-- Brane
On 26.11.2012 21:25, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 26.11.2012 16:59, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the third release of
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC.
The result of the vote is summarised here:
http://markmail.org/thread/owksv6lbcs6zq7th
The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and KEYS
can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
The release itself is created from:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/tags/0.3-incubating/
(r1412891)
Issues identified to be fixed for the next release are listed here:
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/273
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/274
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.3
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
+1 (binding)
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
