On 11 December 2012 17:05, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi ! > :) > > On 12/11/12, Peter Koželj <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is not strictly related to this ticket alone. I would like to get a > > clear picture who is doing what to the ticket page concurrently at this > > moment. > > > > I know Matevz is working on responsive layout. How is this ticket related > > to that work? > > Ticket header is improved considering Joachim's mockups . There's no > work in proposed patch for any responsive feature , as far as the > meaning of responsiveness is concerned [1]_ . > > > And there is some ongoing work with inline editing/removing modify > section > > by Olemis? > > > > yes , I'm working on this since September 26th and along the way many > times the work on that ticket was paused . Now I'm solving some > technical difficulties . Yesterday Joachim contacted me to provide a > quick solution for #234 and there you have it . > > > Do we need some coordination on this? > > > > What kind of coordination do you need ? AFAICS , there are only two > tickets assigned to me #115 and #146 and afaics > > 1- Joachim has assigned #217 to mathevzb . > 2- I've done nothing related to layout responsiveness [1]_ > 3- Updated look and feel is needed for #146 . Otherwise > the same feature should be implemented twice . > > ... afaics , if Joachim approves the patch for #146 which really > belongs to #296 (created after suggestions received from ) mathevzb > should rebase work on responsive layout to include those changes . My > changes have nothing to do with responsiveness . > > What exactly am I missing ? > > .. [1] Scaffolding - #Responsive design > (http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/scaffolding.html#responsive) >
Ah, clear then. I was just a bit confused with the tickets and wanted to check that parallel work would not take us in two totally oposite directions. > > PS: OTOH , I c Jure has proposed something akin to product > environments while #115 is assigned to me in the issue tracker . > > Have you been working on #115 as part of #288 ? If so , how is the > work started for #288 related to #115 ? I look forward to see your > changes so as to review and compare with my current work on that > direction . > > Jure will probably comment on this better then I. AFAIK he was more focused on Datamodel-Trac-Plugins backward compatibility for now, and I imagine (or hope) this should be inline with product environments. I'll talk to him today if I can help you two with multiproducts now that I am more or less finished with whitelabeling. Maybe we can meet on BH IRC later today? Regards, Peter
