On 12/18/12, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/12/12 13:13, Joachim Dreimann wrote: >> On 18 December 2012 08:32, Peter Koželj <[email protected]> wrote: >> [...] >> >>> o #156: Waiting for Apache Infra, does this really deserve "critical" >>> priority? >>> >> I would argue that yes, it's critical for improving our development >> environment.
Yes . Incredibly critical I'd rather say . >> It's also worrying that we haven't had movement on this in >> four months, and the ticket is almost six months old. [...] > > As far as I am concerned this is very important for > us. I guess you don't know what you are missing if you are not used to > it being there. I do have been using source browser since long time ago and the one shipped with 0.x releases up to this point is terribly broken . These tickets are exactly for improving the situation https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/query?status=!closed&keywords=~vcs What about raising their priority to critical ? Anyway , even after applying these much more needs to improved , including but not limited to : UX , navigation paths , repository-specific enhancements . > For a start, all the r[commit number] comments in > tickets will spring into usefulness. oh yes ! Add that in front to the list ;) > Getting the repository browser in > everyday use will also begin to feed back into improvements we can make > to it. > definitely right ! -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
